182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11653207)
1. Us and them: scientists' and animal rights campaigners' views of the animal experimentation debate.
Paul ES
Soc Anim; 1995; 3(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 11653207
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The other side of animal rights.
Mulvaney K
New Sci; 1986 Apr; 109(1502):52-3. PubMed ID: 11655760
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Are smelly animals happy animals?: competing definitions of laboratory animal cruelty and public policy.
Groves JM
Soc Anim; 1994; 2(2):125-44. PubMed ID: 11654357
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The public debate about animal experimentation.
Matfield M
Altern Lab Anim; 1995; 23(3):312-6. PubMed ID: 11656567
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Ethics and animals.
Zak S
Atl Mon; 1989 Mar; 263(3):68-74. PubMed ID: 11659112
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Views from behind the barricade.
Birke L; Michael M
New Sci; 1992 Apr; 134(1815):29-32. PubMed ID: 11656103
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Animal experiments: the long debate.
Festing S
New Sci; 1989 Jan; 121(1649):51-4. PubMed ID: 11655917
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Historical issues concerning animal experimentation in the United States.
Sechzer JA
Soc Sci Med; 1981; 15F():13-7. PubMed ID: 11655143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Experimenting on animals: a reconsideration.
Jamieson D
Between Species; 1985; 1(3):4-11. PubMed ID: 12091948
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The researchers' dilemma.
Birke L; Michael M
New Sci; 1992 Apr; 134(1815):25-8. PubMed ID: 11656102
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The case for animal research in psychology.
Baldwin E
J Soc Issues; 1993; 49(1):121-31. PubMed ID: 11652912
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The three Rs: a restrictive and refutable rigmarole.
Lansdell H
Ethics Behav; 1993; 3(2):177-85. PubMed ID: 11652253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Laboratory animals need only humane treatment: animal "rights" may debase human rights.
Landsell H
Int J Neurosci; 1988; 42():169-78. PubMed ID: 11650873
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The animal research controversy: exploring student attitudes.
Richmond G; Engelmann M; Krupka LR
Am Biol Teach; 1990; 52(8):467-71. PubMed ID: 11653959
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Ethical (and unethical) treatment of animals.
Jackson D
Lancet; 1987 Apr; 1(8539):970. PubMed ID: 11644462
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Plus ça change: anti-vivisection then and now.
Ritvo H
Sci Technol Human Values; 1984; 9(2):57-66. PubMed ID: 11650679
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Using animals in medical research.
Kingman S; Zimmerman D; Dolley M; Spurgeon D; Yamauchi M; Dorozynski A; Karcher H
BMJ; 1993 Apr; 306(6884):1019-23. PubMed ID: 11643124
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Victorian values and animal rights.
Elston MA
New Sci; 1992 May; 134(1822):28-31. PubMed ID: 11656116
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Recombinant DNA research; actions under guidelines; notice.
U.S. National Institutes of Health
Fed Regist; 1985 Mar; 50(47):9760-7. PubMed ID: 11655783
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. When to experiment on animals.
Bateson P
New Sci; 1986 Feb; 109(1496):30-2. PubMed ID: 11655736
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
