350 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11653222)
21. Questions and answers.
Goodwin FK
J Calif Alliance Ment Ill; 1994; 5(1):45-7. PubMed ID: 11653321
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Fears mount for gene scrutiny as watchdog faces axe.
Kiernan V
New Sci; 1996 Jun; 150(2033):10. PubMed ID: 11656540
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. OPRR and FDA propose revised expedited review categories.
McGough H
IRB; 1998; 20(1):9, 11. PubMed ID: 11655326
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Institutional review boards in the university setting: review of pharmaceutical testing protocols, informed consent and ethical concerns.
Kobasic DM
J Coll Univ Law; 1988; 15(2):185-216. PubMed ID: 11659168
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Medicine, animal experimentation, and the moral problem of unfortunate humans.
Frey RG
Soc Philos Policy; 1996; 13(2):181-211. PubMed ID: 11653298
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. The FDA's final regulations: IRBs and medical devices.
Holder AR
IRB; 1980; 2(6):1-4. PubMed ID: 11661803
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Xenotransplantation: benefits, risks and regulation.
Cooper DK
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1996 Mar; 78(2):92-6. PubMed ID: 8678465
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Annual review: observed deficiencies and suggested corrections.
Adams MS; Conrad DA
IRB; 1996; 18(6):1-4. PubMed ID: 11654743
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. NIH approves the consent for Baby Fae, or does it?
Levine C
Hastings Cent Rep; 1985 Apr; 15(2):2. PubMed ID: 11643771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. IRBs and research with human biological materials.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1999 Jan; 14(1):2. PubMed ID: 11657556
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Animals as organ donors? Not until they're germ-free.
Stolberg SG
N Y Times Web; 1998 Feb; ():F1, F6. PubMed ID: 11647603
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Getting new drugs to people with AIDS: a public policy response to Lansdale.
Cohen MN
Hastings Constit Law Q; 1991; 18(3):471-85. PubMed ID: 11651493
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Institutional review boards and public health research: an analysis.
Hogue LL
Univ Ark Little Rock Law J; 1978; 1(2):428-54. PubMed ID: 11661619
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Fetal research II: the ethical questions.
Brown HO
Hum Life Rev; 1975; 1(4):118-28. PubMed ID: 11663565
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. "Evaluation of human subject protections in schizophrenia research conducted by the University of ..." (Part III).
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2000 Jan; 15(1):5-6. PubMed ID: 11658036
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Regulation of clinical research: who's protecting who from what?
Petricciani JC
Food Drug Cosmet Law J; 1979 Apr; 34(4):205-7. PubMed ID: 11661718
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Human experimentation: the review process in practice.
Cowan DH
Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1975; 25(3):533-64. PubMed ID: 11661165
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Proposed requirements for informed consent go beyond current federal regulations.
Hum Res Rep; 1994 Jul; 9(7):1-3. PubMed ID: 11659879
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Commission says institutional review boards should change procedures now.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1999 Jan; 14(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 11657555
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The federal fetal experimentation regulations: an establishment clause analysis.
Friedman JM
Minn Law Rev; 1977 Jun; 61(6):961-1005. PubMed ID: 11664831
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
