384 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11653275)
1. High risk infants: thirty years of intensive care.
Harris CH
Bioethics Forum; 1995; 11(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 11653275
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The smallest patients.
Ismach JM
Med World News; 1981 Sep; 22(19):28-30, 32-33+. PubMed ID: 11658387
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Reducing suffering and ensuring beneficial outcomes for neonates: an ethical perspective.
Brodeur D
Bioethics Forum; 1995; 11(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 11653274
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Neonatal intensive care and the premature infant: criteria for intervention.
Freund B
Humane Med; 1993 Oct; 9(4):282-7. PubMed ID: 11654100
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Hospital bioethics: a beginning knowledge base for the neonatal social worker.
Silverman E
Soc Work; 1992 Mar; 37(2):150-4. PubMed ID: 11642999
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Delivery room resuscitation of the high-risk infant: a conflict of rights.
Cooper R
Cathol Lawyer; 1990; 33(4):325-60. PubMed ID: 11659422
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The legacy of Baby Doe: five perspectives.
Ciulla JB
Psychol Today; 1987 Jan; 21(1):70-71, 74-75. PubMed ID: 11658812
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Perinatal care at the threshold of viability. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 163.
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Committee on Obstetric Practice
ACOG Comm Opin; 1995 Nov; No. 163():4 p. PubMed ID: 11660329
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. As more tiny infants live, choices and burdens grow -- smallest survivors: dilemmas of prematurity.
Rosenthal E
N Y Times Web; 1991 Sep; ():1, 26. PubMed ID: 11646300
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Medical ethics in life and death.
Thompson R
Editor Res Rep; 1984 Feb; 1(8):147-68. PubMed ID: 11652477
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Treatment dilemmas for imperiled newborns: why quality of life counts.
Rhoden NK
South Calif Law Rev; 1985 Sep; 58(6):1283-347. PubMed ID: 11660412
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Premature infants: a legal approach to decision-making in neonatal intensive care.
Gorski SL
Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1985; 19(3-4):261-81. PubMed ID: 11649774
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Withholding treatment from defective newborns: who decides and on what criteria?
Longino PH
Univ Kans Law Rev; 1983; 31(3):377-407. PubMed ID: 11658479
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Case presentation 1 (1990): an infant with necrotic skin lesion -- responses by the Bioethics Study Group that convenes at the National Institutes of Health and by the patient's HEC.
HEC Forum; 1990; 2(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 11645675
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. What makes a life worth saving?
Smith HM; Strong C
Hastings Cent Rep; 1984 Feb; 14(1):48. PubMed ID: 11644133
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Neonatal ethical dilemmas examined.
Brodeur D
Issues (St Louis Mo); 1994; 9(6):1-5, 8. PubMed ID: 11652838
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Intensive care of extremely premature newborns.
Joseph R
Singapore J Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Jul; 20(2):45-7. PubMed ID: 11659322
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Infant care review committees: an effective approach to the Baby Doe dilemma?
Shapiro RS; Barthel R
Hastings Law J; 1986 May; 37(5):827-62. PubMed ID: 11655857
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Little murders.
Patrick JG
New Times; 1978 Apr; 10(7):32-7. PubMed ID: 11658277
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Disabled newborns and the federal child abuse amendments: tenuous protection.
Smith SR
Hastings Law J; 1986 May; 37(5):765-825. PubMed ID: 11655856
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
