These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

330 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11653286)

  • 1. Withholding medical treatment from infants: when is it child neglect?
    Knepper K
    Univ Louisv J Fam Law; 1994-1995 Winter; 33(1):1-53. PubMed ID: 11653286
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Law, medicine, and morality: the cases of Infant Doe and Pamela Hamilton.
    Klinefelter D
    J Law Relig; 1984; 2(2):413-27. PubMed ID: 11651848
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Infant Doe and Baby Jane Doe: medical treatment of the handicapped newborn.
    Horan DJ; Balch BJ
    Linacre Q; 1985 Feb; 52(1):45-76. PubMed ID: 11651855
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Baby Doe cases: compromise and moral dilemma.
    Haddon PA
    Emory Law J; 1985; 34(3-4):545-615. PubMed ID: 11658790
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Life and death decisions in the nursery: standards and procedures for withholding lifesaving treatment from infants.
    Smith SR
    NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1982; 27(4):1125-86. PubMed ID: 11651775
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The future of Baby Doe.
    Singer P; Kuhse H
    New York Rev Books; 1984 Mar; 31(3):17-22. PubMed ID: 11658414
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. "New" rights for handicapped newborns: Baby Doe and beyond.
    Phillips CA
    Calif West Law Rev; 1985; 22(1):127-58. PubMed ID: 11658804
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Severely disabled newborns: to live or let die?
    Jackson CC
    J Leg Med; 1987 Mar; 8(1):135-76. PubMed ID: 11644153
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Infant care review committees: an effective approach to the Baby Doe dilemma?
    Shapiro RS; Barthel R
    Hastings Law J; 1986 May; 37(5):827-62. PubMed ID: 11655857
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The legacy of Infant Doe.
    Cosby MG
    Bayl Law Rev; 1982; 34(4):699-715. PubMed ID: 11651747
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quality of life, sanctity of creation: palliative or apotheosis?
    Smith GP
    Neb Law Rev; 1984; 63(4):709-40. PubMed ID: 11652479
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Refusal of lifesaving treatment for minors.
    Annas GJ
    J Fam Law; 1984-1985; 23(2):217-40. PubMed ID: 11651846
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A legal challenge to the refusal to provide inappropriate treatment: the case of Baby K.
    Watson SB
    Clin Ethics Rep; 1994; 8(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 11652775
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Disabled newborns and the federal child abuse amendments: tenuous protection.
    Smith SR
    Hastings Law J; 1986 May; 37(5):765-825. PubMed ID: 11655856
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bioethics in the courts: summaries of selected judicial decisions, 1989 to 1995.
    Nelson LJ
    Clin Ethics Rep; 1995; 9(1-2):1-20. PubMed ID: 11653201
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Born to live or born to die: the handicapped newborn in New Jersey.
    Sarno JJ
    Seton Hall Legis J; 1987; 11(1):201-22. PubMed ID: 11651899
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Child abuse by whom? -- Parental rights and judicial competency determinations: the Baby K and Baby Terry cases.
    Bopp J; Coleson RE
    Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1994; 20(4):821-46. PubMed ID: 11652997
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Forgoing treatment of critically ill newborns and the legal legacy of Baby Doe.
    Nelson LJ
    Clin Ethics Rep; 1992; 6(2):1-6. PubMed ID: 11652072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Medical decision making for and by children: tensions between parent, state, and child.
    Wadlington W
    Univ Ill Law Rev; 1994; 2():311-36. PubMed ID: 11659988
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Withholding life-prolonging medical treatment from the institutionalized person--who decides?
    Corbett KA; Raciti RM
    New Engl J Prison Law; 1976; 3(1):47-83. PubMed ID: 11664738
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.