These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

538 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11653327)

  • 1. Perspectives of protocol reviewers.
    Moline ML; Aisen MW
    J Calif Alliance Ment Ill; 1994; 5(1):59-60. PubMed ID: 11653327
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Protocol review within the context of a research program.
    Miller FG; Rosenstein DL
    IRB; 1998; 20(4):7-10. PubMed ID: 11657088
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hyperbaric research at Duke University--ethical considerations.
    Bennett PB; Kylstra JA
    Forsvarsmedicin; 1973; 9(3):373-8. PubMed ID: 11661280
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Medical ethics in the dock.
    N Y Times Web; 1994 Mar; ():A16. PubMed ID: 11647023
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Approving high risk, rejecting low risk: the case of two cases.
    Shannon TA; Ockene IS; Levine RJ
    IRB; 1985; 7(1):6-8. PubMed ID: 11649618
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The concept of the IRB and bureaucratic reality: an exchange of letters.
    van Eys J; Levine RJ
    IRB; 1984; 6(4):8-10. PubMed ID: 11649563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ethical issues in clinical neurological research.
    Shore D; Berg K; Mullican C
    J Calif Alliance Ment Ill; 1994; 5(1):61-2. PubMed ID: 11653329
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A protocol review guide to reduce IRB inconsistency.
    Prentice ED; Antonson DL
    IRB; 1987; 9(1):9-11. PubMed ID: 11649892
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Informed consent process is deemed "legally and ethically invalid" by witness.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 1995 Jan; 10(1):4-5. PubMed ID: 11660008
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Proposed guidelines for the participation of persons with dementia as research subjects.
    Keyserlingk EW; Glass K; Kogan S; Gauthier S
    Perspect Biol Med; 1995; 38(2):319-61. PubMed ID: 11644666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The case for per patient payments.
    Lewis JP
    IRB; 1988; 10(5):9. PubMed ID: 11650075
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. "Evaluation of human subject protections in schizophrenia research conducted by the University of ..." (Part III).
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2000 Jan; 15(1):5-6. PubMed ID: 11658036
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Institutional review boards in the university setting: review of pharmaceutical testing protocols, informed consent and ethical concerns.
    Kobasic DM
    J Coll Univ Law; 1988; 15(2):185-216. PubMed ID: 11659168
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Judging the ethical merit of clinical trials: what criteria do research ethics board members use?
    Meslin EM; Lavery JV; Sutherland HJ; Till JE
    IRB; 1994; 16(4):6-10. PubMed ID: 11654136
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is post-marketing drug follow-up research or advertising?
    Weiss GB; Winslade WJ
    IRB; 1987; 9(4):10-1. PubMed ID: 11649947
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Who shall decide when doctors disagree? A review of the legal development of informed consent and the implications of proposed lay review of human experimentation.
    Ratnoff MF
    Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1975; 25(3):472-532. PubMed ID: 11661164
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dilemmas in paying for clinical research: the view from the IRB.
    Lind SE
    IRB; 1987; 9(2):1-5. PubMed ID: 11649900
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A new problem for IRBs: screening for HIV antibodies.
    Meyers K
    IRB; 1989; 11(6):10-1. PubMed ID: 11650285
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Placebo: pro and con.
    Lapierre YD; Weijer C
    NCEHR Commun; 1997-1998 Winter-Spring; 8(2):11-5. PubMed ID: 11660612
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Institutional review boards as an instrument of assessment: research involving human subjects in the U.S.
    Gray BH
    Sci Technol Human Values; 1978; (25):. PubMed ID: 11663042
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.