These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
1043 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11653366)
41. All above board: openness is the only option if science is to maintain its integrity. New Sci; 2004 Mar 6-12; 181(2437):3. PubMed ID: 15139348 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Fraud and misrepresentation in research--whose responsibility? Wigodsky HS IRB; 1984; 6(2):1-5. PubMed ID: 11649536 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Ghost story: at medical journals, writers paid by industry play big role. Mathews AW Wall St J (East Ed); 2005 Dec; ():A1, A8. PubMed ID: 16506304 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Questions of scientific responsibility: the Baltimore case. Lang S Ethics Behav; 1993; 3(1):3-72. PubMed ID: 11653082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Ethical guidelines for publications of research. Endocrine Society. Council J Clin Endocrinol Metab; 1998 Jan; 83(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 11645018 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. New censors in the academy: two approaches to curb their influences. Davis RD Sci Technol Human Values; 1988; 13(1-2):64-74. PubMed ID: 11650140 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Glory days or the lure of scientific misconduct. Knoll E J Infor Ethics; 1996; 5(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 11653392 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. The persistence of fraud in the literature: the Darsee case. Kochan CA; Budd JM J Am Soc Inf Sci; 1992 Aug; 43(7):488-93. PubMed ID: 11653988 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. [Investigation of scientific fraud. Statements from the Swedish Research Council not sufficiently normative]. Werkö L Lakartidningen; 2006 Oct 25-31; 103(43):3288-91. PubMed ID: 17117661 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Scientific misconduct: tip of an iceberg or the elephant in the room? Luther F J Dent Res; 2010 Dec; 89(12):1364-7. PubMed ID: 20940367 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. British cast spotlight on misconduct in scientific research. Altman LK N Y Times Web; 1998 Jun; ():F3. PubMed ID: 11647563 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. What do we know about fraud and other forms of intellectual dishonesty in science? Part 1: the spectrum of deviant behavior in science. Garfield E Curr Contents Clin Med; 1987 Apr; 15(14):3-7. PubMed ID: 11649955 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Suppression, bias, and selection in science: the case of cancer research. Hess DJ Account Res; 1999; 6(4):245-57. PubMed ID: 11657839 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. The process of publication. Koshland DE Science; 1989 Aug; 245(4918):573. PubMed ID: 11644383 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. A view of misconduct in science. Racker E Nature; 1989 May; 339(6220):91-3. PubMed ID: 2716839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. The exposure of a scientific fraud. Swan N New Sci; 1988 Dec; 120(1641):30-1. PubMed ID: 11655909 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Misconduct and fraud in research: social and legislative issues symposium of the Society of University Surgeons. Simmons RL; Polk HC; Williams B; Mavroudis C Surgery; 1991 Jul; 110(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 1866681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Global trend: more science, more fraud. Altman L; Broad WJ N Y Times Web; 2005 Dec; ():F1, F6. PubMed ID: 16450465 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Science, journalism, and whistle-blowing. Koshland DE Science; 1988 Apr; 240(4852):585. PubMed ID: 11644303 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. What science can learn from science fraud. Wade N New Sci; 1983 Jul; 99(1368):273-5. PubMed ID: 11655555 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]