These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
254 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11653371)
1. Negotiating towards death. Winkelstein P Shma; 1996 Feb; 26(508):3-4. PubMed ID: 11653371 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Medical futility: a futile concept? Shiner K Wash Lee Law Rev; 1996; 53(2):803-48. PubMed ID: 11656798 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Child abuse by whom? -- Parental rights and judicial competency determinations: the Baby K and Baby Terry cases. Bopp J; Coleson RE Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1994; 20(4):821-46. PubMed ID: 11652997 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Hospital appeals decision ordering treatment for baby missing a brain. Greenhouse L N Y Times Web; 1993 Sep; ():A10. PubMed ID: 11646990 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. When physicians balk at futile care: implications of the disability rights laws. Peters PG Northwest Univ Law Rev; 1997; 91(3):798-864. PubMed ID: 11660527 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Our discardable people. Smith WJ Hum Life Rev; 1998; 24(3):78-87. PubMed ID: 11657682 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. When a patient demands what health care providers deem foolish: medical-ethical analysis of the case of Baby K. Peabody JL Clin Ethics Rep; 1993; 7(4):1-12. PubMed ID: 11653093 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Commentary: what is really at stake in Baby K? A response to Ellen Flannery. Clayton EW J Law Med Ethics; 1995; 23(1):13-4. PubMed ID: 11644715 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Bioethics and the law: the case of Helga Wanglie: a clash at the bedside -- medically futile treatment v. patient autonomy. Blake DC; Maldonado L; Meinhardt RA Whittier Law Rev; 1993; 14():119-44. PubMed ID: 11652671 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Ventilating issues of life and death: the case of Helga Wanglie. Lomasky LE Public Aff Q; 1994 Apr; 8(2):153-68. PubMed ID: 11652919 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Religious traditions and public policy. Bleich JD Assia Jew Med Ethics; 1988 May; 1(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 12083149 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining therapy: all systems are not yet "go". Snider GL Am J Respir Crit Care Med; 1995 Feb; 151(2):279-81. PubMed ID: 11654310 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Atlanta court bars efforts to end life support for stricken girl, 13. Smothers R N Y Times Web; 1991 Oct; ():A10. PubMed ID: 11647898 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. In re Baby K. U.S. District Court, E.D. Virginia, Alexandria Division Fed Suppl; 1993 Jul; 832():1022-31. PubMed ID: 11648613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. On the bioethics front: the power of the nonrational in demands for marginally beneficial or useless treatments. Young EW Second Opin; 1994 Oct; 20(2):95-8. PubMed ID: 11645285 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. "Mary, Mary, quite contrary, how was I to know?" Michael Martin, absolute prescience, and the right to die in Michigan. Broder AJ; Cranford RE Univ Detroit Mercy Law Rev; 1995; 72(4):787-832. PubMed ID: 11654371 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Withholding care from patients: Boston case asks who decides. Kolata G N Y Times Web; 1995 Apr; ():A1, B8. PubMed ID: 11647996 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Commentary: bringing clarity to the futility debate: are the cases wrong? Schneiderman LJ Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1998; 7(3):273-8. PubMed ID: 11645098 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Death of 'Baby K' leaves a legacy of legal precedents. Tousignant M; Miller B Washington Post; 1995 Apr; ():B3. PubMed ID: 11647076 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. A case of futility or patient autonomy. Olsen CG J Ethics Law Aging; 1996; 2(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 11654406 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]