These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11653446)

  • 61. GMC finds GPs guilty of fraud.
    Dyer O
    BMJ; 1994 Apr; 308(6937):1122. PubMed ID: 11644557
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Inappropriate authorship in collaborative science research.
    Pennock RT
    Public Aff Q; 1996 Oct; 10(4):379-93. PubMed ID: 11654653
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Character and the ethical conduct of research.
    Pellegrino ED
    Account Res; 1992; 2(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 11651456
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Fraud investigation.
    Mosher EH; Blair C; Silver GA
    Science; 1982 Mar; 215(4539):1456, 1458. PubMed ID: 11643730
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Teaching scientific integrity.
    Gifford F
    Centen Rev; 1994; 38(2):297-314. PubMed ID: 11656760
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Congressmen investigate scientific fraud.
    Perspectives Prof; 1981; 1(3-4):10-2. PubMed ID: 11649375
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Whistleblowing in biomedical research: report from a workshop.
    Mishkin B
    IRB; 1982 Feb; 4(2):8-9. PubMed ID: 11658314
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. In the trenches, doubts about scientific integrity.
    Hamilton DP
    Science; 1992 Mar; 255(5052):1636. PubMed ID: 11642983
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Fraud by scientists seen linked to competition.
    Russell C
    Washington Post; 1985 May; ():A8. PubMed ID: 11646422
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Questions of scientific responsibility: the Baltimore case.
    Lang S
    Ethics Behav; 1993; 3(1):3-72. PubMed ID: 11653082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. UK royal college responds to scientific fraud.
    Ramsay S
    Lancet; 1995 Jun; 345(8964):1566. PubMed ID: 11657385
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Data audit by a regulatory agency: its effect and implication for others.
    Shapiro MF
    Account Res; 1992; 2(3):219-29. PubMed ID: 11653981
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. No misconduct or fraud in Baltimore case.
    Anderson A
    Nature; 1988 Dec; 336(6199):505. PubMed ID: 11644320
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Scientific misconduct in academia: a survey and analysis of applicable law.
    Sise CB
    San Diego Law Rev; 1991; 28(2):401-28. PubMed ID: 11651628
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Fraud and misrepresentation in research--whose responsibility?
    Wigodsky HS
    IRB; 1984; 6(2):1-5. PubMed ID: 11649536
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. NCI director interrogated by Senate committee.
    Perspectives Prof; 1981; 1(3-4):6-9. PubMed ID: 11649378
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Biologist in fraud investigation.
    New Sci; 1983 Jun; 98(1360):609. PubMed ID: 11655541
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Biologist 'has admitted fraud.
    New Sci; 1983 Jul; 99(1365):5. PubMed ID: 11655539
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Ethic of science.
    Bishop JM
    New Sci; 1981 Nov; 92(1279):457. PubMed ID: 11664183
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Reply to Ernhart, Scarr, and Geneson.
    Needleman HL
    Ethics Behav; 1993; 3(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 11653084
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.