271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11653462)
1. 'Government directive on infant euthanasia is ambiguous.
Klug J
Ob Gyn News; 1982 Aug 15-31; 17(16):11. PubMed ID: 11653462
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Bowen v. American Hospital Association: federal regulation is powerless to save Baby Doe.
Cantrell DF
Indiana Law Rev; 1986; 19(4):1199-218. PubMed ID: 11650766
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. 'Baby Doe' proposed reg suffers setback in court.
Med World News; 1983 Dec; 24(23):27. PubMed ID: 11645566
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Another court challenge predicted following revised 'Baby Doe' rule.
Med World News; 1983 Jul; 24(14):54, 59. PubMed ID: 11645668
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. "New" rights for handicapped newborns: Baby Doe and beyond.
Phillips CA
Calif West Law Rev; 1985; 22(1):127-58. PubMed ID: 11658804
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Govt. rules on withholding impaired infants' care.
Miller RH
Ob Gyn News; 1983 Apr 15-30; 18(8):20. PubMed ID: 11653474
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The care of defective neonates, ethics committees and federal intervention.
Riga PJ
Linacre Q; 1984 Aug; 51(3):255-76. PubMed ID: 11649572
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. 'Infant Doe': a hospital ethics committee can help.
Capron AM
Washington Post; 1983 Apr; ():A15. PubMed ID: 11646278
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Forgoing treatment of critically ill newborns and the legal legacy of Baby Doe.
Nelson LJ
Clin Ethics Rep; 1992; 6(2):1-6. PubMed ID: 11652072
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The Supreme Court and Baby Jane Doe.
Drinan RF
America (NY); 1986 Mar; 154(9):180-2. PubMed ID: 11658666
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. What ever happened to Baby Jane...Doe?
Jolly CM
West State Univ Law Rev; 1987; 14(2):543-9. PubMed ID: 11651891
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Baby Doe's new guardians: federal policy brings nontreatment decisions out of hiding.
Born MA
KY Law J; 1986-1987; 75(3):659-75. PubMed ID: 11651897
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Recent governmental action regarding the treatment of seriously ill newborns.
Lawton SE; Carder EB; Weisman AW
J Coll Univ Law; 1985; 11(4):405-16. PubMed ID: 11651864
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Quality of life, sanctity of creation: palliative or apotheosis?
Smith GP
Neb Law Rev; 1984; 63(4):709-40. PubMed ID: 11652479
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Lying hopelessly ill, infant tests new law of hospital survival.
Sternberg S
Washington Post; 1983 Apr; ():A4. PubMed ID: 11646338
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Abortion's shrinking majority.
Murphy J
Time; 1986 Jun; 127(25):30-1. PubMed ID: 11645638
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The legislative response to Infant Doe.
Kuzma AL
Indiana Law J; 1983-1984; 59(3):377-416. PubMed ID: 11658614
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Born to live or born to die: the handicapped newborn in New Jersey.
Sarno JJ
Seton Hall Legis J; 1987; 11(1):201-22. PubMed ID: 11651899
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Disabled infant's parents win again.
Krieger L
Am Med News; 1984 Mar; 27(10):2, 28. PubMed ID: 11653558
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Withdrawal of life-support in the newborn: whose baby is it?
Clark FI
Southwest Univ Law Rev; 1993; 23(1):1-46. PubMed ID: 11659817
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
