821 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11653483)
1. Confidentiality and the "dangerous" patient: implications of Tarasoff for psychiatrists and lawyers.
Merton V
Emory Law J; 1982; 31(2):263-343. PubMed ID: 11653483
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Tarasoff, myth and reality: an empirical study of private law in action.
Givelber DJ; Bowers WJ; Blitch CL
Wis L Rev; 1984; 1984(2):443-97. PubMed ID: 11653756
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Psychotherapists' fear of Tarasoff: all in the mind?
Mangalmurti VS
J Psychiatry Law; 1994; 22(3):379-409. PubMed ID: 11653155
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. tarasoff and the psychotherapist's duty to warn.
Daley DW
San Diego Law Rev; 1975 Jun; 12(4):932-51. PubMed ID: 11661253
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. "Tarasoff" defendants: social justice or ethical decay?
Leong GB; Eth S; Silva JA
J Forensic Sci; 1994 Jan; 39(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 11644513
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California: psychotherapists, policemen and the duty to warn--an unreasonable extension of the common law?
Kaplan RB
Gold Gate Law Rev; 1975; 6(1):229-48. PubMed ID: 11661331
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The dangerous patient exception and the duty to warn: creation of a dangerous precedent?
Lee V
Univ Calif Davis Law Rev; 1976; 9():549-68. PubMed ID: 11664780
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Tarasoff down under: the psychiatrist's duty to warn in Australia.
Mendelson D; Mendelson G
J Psychiatry Law; 1991; 19(1-2):33-61. PubMed ID: 11659859
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The patient or his victim: the therapist's dilemma.
Fleming JG; Maximov B
Calif Law Rev; 1974 May; 62(3):1025-68. PubMed ID: 11663459
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California. 23 Dec 1974.
California. Supreme Court
Wests Calif Report; 1974; 118():129-45. PubMed ID: 11645905
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Psychiatrists' duty to the public: protection from dangerous patients.
Poltz JT
Univ Ill Law Forum; 1976; 1976(4):1103-28. PubMed ID: 11664786
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The use of empathy in forensic examinations.
Shuman DW
Ethics Behav; 1993; 3(3 and 4):289-302. PubMed ID: 11659813
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The evolution of Tarasoff: recent developments in the psychiatrist's duties to warn potential victims, protect the public, and predict dangerousness.
Greenberg LT
J Psychiatry Law; 1984; 12(3):315-48. PubMed ID: 11658762
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Medical confidentiality--who protects the victims?
Hunter TH
Pharos Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Med Soc; 1977 Apr; 40(2):24-9. PubMed ID: 11661471
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Ethical and moral dilemmas confronting forensic scientists.
Schroeder OC
J Forensic Sci; 1984 Oct; 29(4):966-86. PubMed ID: 11644169
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Therapists as protectors and policemen: new roles as a result of Tarasoff?
Bersoff DN
Prof Psychol; 1976 Aug; 7(3):267-73. PubMed ID: 11661333
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Where the public peril begins: a survey of psychotherapists to determine the effects of Tarasoff.
Wise TP
Stanford Law Rev; 1978 Nov; 31(1):165-90. PubMed ID: 11665029
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Physicians and surgeons--negligence--psychotherapist has a duty to warn an endangered victim whose peril was disclosed to psychotherapist by patient.
Morrow KM
N D Law Rev; 1976; 53(2):279-84. PubMed ID: 11664785
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California: psychotherapist's obligation of confidentiality versus the duty to warn.
Nesbitt NA
Tulsa Law J; 1977; 12(4):747-57. PubMed ID: 11661722
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Medical and psychotherapy privileges and confidentiality: on giving with one hand and removing with the other.
Smith SR
KY Law J; 1986-1987; 75(3):473-557. PubMed ID: 11651896
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
