These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
23. Plan to end genetics panel troubles EPA. Science; 1996 Aug; 273(5278):1035. PubMed ID: 11644823 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. US genetic regulations: bacterial field trial to go ahead. Budiansky S Nature; 1984 Jun 7-13; 309(5968):483. PubMed ID: 6587190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Recombinant DNA. Prospect of new US regulation: surprise welcome for EPA. Budiansky S Nature; 1984 Aug 23-29; 310(5979):613. PubMed ID: 6590966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. U.S. biotechnology: living with regulation. David P Nature; 1983 Oct; 305(5937):755. PubMed ID: 11653510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Biotech guidelines challenged by Rifkin. Sun M Science; 1986 Aug; 233(4763):516. PubMed ID: 11643926 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Firm gets NIH panel's approval for judge-barred DNA field test. Hilts PJ Washington Post; 1984 Jun; ():A1, A10. PubMed ID: 11646391 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Monsanto may bypass NIH in microbe test. Sun M Science; 1985 Jan; 227(4683):153. PubMed ID: 11643692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Court rules against gene-splice field test. Miller JA Sci News; 1984 May; 125(21):325. PubMed ID: 11653546 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Genetically engineered plants get a green light. Norman C Science; 1983 Oct; 222(4619):35. PubMed ID: 11644054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. California field test goes forward. Crawford M Science; 1987 May; 236(4801):511. PubMed ID: 11643987 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Biotech firms win approval for more open-air tests. Joyce C New Sci; 1984 Jun; 102(1413):4. PubMed ID: 11655646 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Industry gene-splice field tests approved. Miller JA Sci News; 1984 Jun; 125(23):356. PubMed ID: 11653555 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Recombinant DNA research: proposed actions under the guidelines; notice. U.S. National Institutes of Health Fed Regist; 1997 Feb; 62(31):7108-23. PubMed ID: 11654870 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Corporate responsibility for recombinant DNA activities. Berger BA Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1981; 12(4):913-24. PubMed ID: 11649592 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Recombinant DNA research; availability of environmental assessment for public comment; request for comments on need for a programmatic environmental impact statement; notice. U.S. National Institutes of Health Fed Regist; 1985 Apr; 50(72):14794-6. PubMed ID: 11645548 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Biotech firm gets another black eye over experiment. Sun M Science; 1986 Mar; 231(4743):1242. PubMed ID: 11643907 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Recombinant DNA research; actions under guidelines; notice. U.S. National Institutes of Health Fed Regist; 1984 Apr; 49(81):17844-8. PubMed ID: 11655581 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]