159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11653491)
1. Disciplinary action for DNA violation.
Sci News; 1981 Mar; 119(13):198. PubMed ID: 11653491
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. NIH committee sheds darkness on UCSD case.
Wade N
Science; 1981 Apr; 212(4490):27. PubMed ID: 11643634
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Genetic scientist is punished for test violations.
Hilts PJ
Washington Post; 1981 Mar; ():A1, A7. PubMed ID: 11646109
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Agency clears genetic researcher.
Schneider K
N Y Times Web; 1988 Jan; ():A18. PubMed ID: 11646628
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Cline stripped of research grants.
Dickson D
Nature; 1981 Dec; 294(5840):391-2. PubMed ID: 11643675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Gene rule violation causes funding loss.
Miller JA
Sci News; 1981 Dec; 120(24):375. PubMed ID: 11649356
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Federal agency says two universities did not provide full details in misconduct case: U.S. ex. rel. Condie v. Univ. of California, Univ. of Utah, and Ninnemann (Part III).
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1996 Sep; 11(9):4-5. PubMed ID: 11660228
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A question of "fitness.
Hamilton DP
Science; 1990 Jun; 248(4963):198. PubMed ID: 11642777
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Conduct unbecoming?
Weiss P
N Y Times Mag; 1989 Oct; ():40-41, 68-69, 95. PubMed ID: 11650263
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. If it's research, it must be reviewed: an NIH reprimand.
Levine C
Hastings Cent Rep; 1986 Feb; 16(1):2-3. PubMed ID: 11643913
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. How well do university researchers police themselves?: a case at Georgetown raises the question.
Weiser B
Washington Post; 1991 Jan; ():Health Su-13. PubMed ID: 11646786
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Scientific misconduct: new court challenge for OSI.
Anderson C
Nature; 1992 Apr; 356(6369):466. PubMed ID: 11642987
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. U.S. inquiry on misconduct in discovery of AIDS virus.
Hilts PJ
N Y Times Web; 1990 Oct; ():1, 6. PubMed ID: 11646783
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Too good to be true.
Colt GH
Harv Mag; 1983; 85(6):22-28, 54. PubMed ID: 11649472
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Harvard researcher draws heavy penalty for faking results.
Med World News; 1983 Mar; 24(5):48-50. PubMed ID: 11653447
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. NIH severs ties with researcher who experimented on embryos.
Weiss R
Washington Post; 1997 Jan; ():A6-7. PubMed ID: 11648051
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The assault on David Baltimore.
Kevles DJ
New Yorker; 1996 May; 72(13):94-98, 100-104, 106-109. PubMed ID: 11654450
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Fraudbusters back at NIH.
Culliton BJ
Science; 1990 Jun; 48(4963):1599. PubMed ID: 11653895
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Scientific misconduct in academia: a survey and analysis of applicable law.
Sise CB
San Diego Law Rev; 1991; 28(2):401-28. PubMed ID: 11651628
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Firm gets NIH panel's approval for judge-barred DNA field test.
Hilts PJ
Washington Post; 1984 Jun; ():A1, A10. PubMed ID: 11646391
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
