218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11653530)
1. The life support cases: myths and realities.
Hartz JN
Los Angel Lawyer; 1982; 5(5):18-20, 33, 52+. PubMed ID: 11653530
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The right to die.
Kirven G
Ky Bench Bar; 1975 Jul; 39(3):16+. PubMed ID: 11664754
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Euthanasia, the right to die and privacy: observations on some recent cases.
Riga PJ
Linc Law Rev; 1980; 11(2):109-65. PubMed ID: 11658630
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Death with dignity laws: a plea for uniform legislation.
Freamon BK
Seton Hall Legis J; 1982; 5(2):105-47. PubMed ID: 11651748
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The recent amendments to the Texas Natural Death Act: implications for health care providers.
Greenfield RE
St Marys Law J; 1986; 17(3):1003-51. PubMed ID: 11652489
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Incompetents and the right to die: in search of consistent meaningful standards.
Strasser M
KY Law J; 1994-1995; 83(4):733-98. PubMed ID: 11654615
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Withholding life-prolonging medical treatment from the institutionalized person--who decides?
Corbett KA; Raciti RM
New Engl J Prison Law; 1976; 3(1):47-83. PubMed ID: 11664738
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The Virginia Natural Death Act--a critical analysis.
Murphy JG
Univ Richmond Law Rev; 1983; 17(4):863-79. PubMed ID: 11649800
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Therefore, choose death.
Brown ML
Human Rights; 1982; 10(3):38-45. PubMed ID: 11651709
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The right to die in peace: substituted consent and the mentally incompetent.
Brant J
Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1977; 11(4):959-73. PubMed ID: 11664849
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The legal aspects of the right to die: before and after the Quinlan decision.
Becker D; Fleming R; Overstreet R
KY Law J; 1977; 65(4):823-79. PubMed ID: 11661533
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Right-to-die damage actions: developments in the law.
Miller DH
Denver Univ Law Rev; 1988; 65(2-3):181-212. PubMed ID: 11659201
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Deciding for the incompetent patient: identifying the role of family members.
Healey JM
Conn Med; 1984 Oct; 48(10):687. PubMed ID: 11644167
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Substituted judgment in medical decision making for incompetent persons: In re Storar.
Williams SE
Wis L Rev; 1982; 1982(6):1173-98. PubMed ID: 11651834
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. AIDS and living wills.
Kortlandt CE
AIDS Public Policy J; 1990; 5(4):157-66. PubMed ID: 11650975
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Privacy I: surrogate decision making for the terminally ill.
Eisenberg KG
Annu Surv Am Law; 1988; 1(2):353-84. PubMed ID: 11652656
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. In re Conroy: forging a path to death with dignity.
Agrawal A
Boston Univ Law Rev; 1987 Mar; 67(2):365-89. PubMed ID: 11649960
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. John F. Kennedy Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. Bludworth.
Paulus SM
Issues Law Med; 1985 Sep; 1(2):163-6. PubMed ID: 11643875
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. An overview of Georgia's living will legislation.
Adams CR; Adams CT
Mercer Law Rev; 1984; 36():45-75. PubMed ID: 11652443
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Ruling protects MDs who comply with patients wishing to end treatment.
Rust M
Am Med News; 1985 Jan; 28(2):1, 50. PubMed ID: 11653651
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
