122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11653531)
1. Prolonging life and withdrawing treatment: legal issues.
Horan DJ; Grant ER
Linacre Q; 1983 May; 50(2):153-71. PubMed ID: 11653531
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Therefore, choose death.
Brown ML
Human Rights; 1982; 10(3):38-45. PubMed ID: 11651709
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. AIDS and living wills.
Kortlandt CE
AIDS Public Policy J; 1990; 5(4):157-66. PubMed ID: 11650975
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Death with dignity laws: a plea for uniform legislation.
Freamon BK
Seton Hall Legis J; 1982; 5(2):105-47. PubMed ID: 11651748
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. An overview of Georgia's living will legislation.
Adams CR; Adams CT
Mercer Law Rev; 1984; 36():45-75. PubMed ID: 11652443
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The recent amendments to the Texas Natural Death Act: implications for health care providers.
Greenfield RE
St Marys Law J; 1986; 17(3):1003-51. PubMed ID: 11652489
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Right to die: a survey of legislative and judicial responses to life-support technology.
Richardson E
Glendale Law Rev; 1981-1982; 5(2):188-202. PubMed ID: 11652441
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The Virginia Natural Death Act--a critical analysis.
Murphy JG
Univ Richmond Law Rev; 1983; 17(4):863-79. PubMed ID: 11649800
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. John F. Kennedy Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. Bludworth.
Paulus SM
Issues Law Med; 1985 Sep; 1(2):163-6. PubMed ID: 11643875
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The right of elderly patients to refuse life-sustaining treatment.
Annas GJ; Glantz LH
Milbank Q; 1986; 64(Suppl. 2):95-162. PubMed ID: 11649886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Proxy decisionmaking for the terminally ill: the Virginia approach.
O'Shaughnessy WJ
Va Law Rev; 1984 Sep; 70(6):1269-302. PubMed ID: 11652483
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Deciding for the incompetent patient: identifying the role of family members.
Healey JM
Conn Med; 1984 Oct; 48(10):687. PubMed ID: 11644167
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The right of the elderly to self-determination and New York's legislative imperative.
Tomlinson AK
Pace Law Rev; 1988; 8(1):63-113. PubMed ID: 11650172
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Artificial nutrition and the terminally ill: how should Washington decide?
Beatty JA
Wash Law Rev; 1986 Apr; 61(2):419-57. PubMed ID: 11652503
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. "Living will" legislation in Illinois: what it could mean to doctor and patient.
King PD
Ill Bar J; 1984 Apr; 72(8):408-410, 412-413. PubMed ID: 11649772
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Life-support withdrawal: law of commiseration or principle?
Byrnes JC
Md J Contemp Leg Issues; 1991; 2(2):331-54. PubMed ID: 11651213
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Living wills in New York: are they valid?
Vile SE
Syracuse Law Rev; 1987; 38(4):1369-95. PubMed ID: 11650137
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. In re living will.
Havens SL
Nova Law J; 1981; 5(3):445-70. PubMed ID: 11649552
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Do not resuscitate (no code blue) orders and the 1981 amendments to North Carolina's right to natural death statutes.
Anderson JH; Bobbitt JD
N C Med J; 1981 Dec; 42(12):A1-13. PubMed ID: 11643902
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Corbett v. D'Alessandro.
Paulus SM
Issues Law Med; 1986 Nov; 2(3):217-9. PubMed ID: 11644063
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
