249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11653531)
21. Indiana's new health care consent act: a guiding light for the health care provider.
Thompson WH
Indiana Law Rev; 1988; 21(1):181-203. PubMed ID: 11659030
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Voluntary euthanasia: a proposed remedy.
Cole SS; Shea MS
Albany Law Rev; 1975; 39(4):826-56. PubMed ID: 11661204
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. The right to die.
Kirven G
Ky Bench Bar; 1975 Jul; 39(3):16+. PubMed ID: 11664754
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Withholding life-prolonging medical treatment from the institutionalized person--who decides?
Corbett KA; Raciti RM
New Engl J Prison Law; 1976; 3(1):47-83. PubMed ID: 11664738
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. The right of elderly patients to refuse life-sustaining treatment.
Annas GJ; Glantz LH
Milbank Q; 1986; 64(Suppl. 2):95-162. PubMed ID: 11649886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Proxy decisionmaking for the terminally ill: the Virginia approach.
O'Shaughnessy WJ
Va Law Rev; 1984 Sep; 70(6):1269-302. PubMed ID: 11652483
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Judicial innovation and policy re-invention: state supreme courts and the right to die.
Glick HR
West Polit Q; 1992; ():71-92. PubMed ID: 11652627
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Right to decline life-prolonging procedures.
Florida
Wests Fla Statut Annot Fla; 1985; Sections 765.01 to 765.15(Suppl. Pamphlet):. PubMed ID: 12043654
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Deciding for the incompetent patient: identifying the role of family members.
Healey JM
Conn Med; 1984 Oct; 48(10):687. PubMed ID: 11644167
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. The right of the elderly to self-determination and New York's legislative imperative.
Tomlinson AK
Pace Law Rev; 1988; 8(1):63-113. PubMed ID: 11650172
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Artificial nutrition and the terminally ill: how should Washington decide?
Beatty JA
Wash Law Rev; 1986 Apr; 61(2):419-57. PubMed ID: 11652503
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Living will legislation in Colorado: an analysis of the Colorado Medical Treatment Decision Act in relation to similar developments in other jurisdictions.
Marsh LA
Denver Univ Law Rev; 1987; 64(1):5-31. PubMed ID: 11652504
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Maine's living will act and the termination of life-sustaining medical procedures.
Herlan ER
Maine Law Rev; 1987; 39(1):83-148. PubMed ID: 11652533
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Live or let die; who decides an incompetent's fate? In re Storar and In re Eichner.
Bates KW
Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1982; 1982(2):387-400. PubMed ID: 11655681
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. "Living will" legislation in Illinois: what it could mean to doctor and patient.
King PD
Ill Bar J; 1984 Apr; 72(8):408-410, 412-413. PubMed ID: 11649772
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. The values history: a new standard of care.
Rich BA
Emory Law J; 1991; 40(4):1109-81. PubMed ID: 11652633
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Life-support withdrawal: law of commiseration or principle?
Byrnes JC
Md J Contemp Leg Issues; 1991; 2(2):331-54. PubMed ID: 11651213
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Informed consent, termination of medical treatment, and the Federal Tort Claims Act: a new proposal for the military health care system.
Deardorff SE
Mil Law Rev; 1987 Jan; 115():1-120. PubMed ID: 11658904
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Incompetents and the right to die: in search of consistent meaningful standards.
Strasser M
KY Law J; 1994-1995; 83(4):733-98. PubMed ID: 11654615
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Government as arbiter, not custodian: relational privacy as foundation for a right to refuse medical treatment prolonging incompetents' lives.
Cox SE
N M Law Rev; 1988; 18(1):131-52. PubMed ID: 11652538
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
