These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11653531)
41. The "terminal condition" condition in Virginia's Natural Death Act. Matthew DB Va Law Rev; 1987 May; 73(4):749-81. PubMed ID: 11652506 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Living wills in New York: are they valid? Vile SE Syracuse Law Rev; 1987; 38(4):1369-95. PubMed ID: 11650137 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Relitigating life and death. Dresser R Ohio State Law J; 1990; 51(2):425-37. PubMed ID: 11652817 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. No-code orders vs. resuscitation: the decision to withhold life-prolonging treatment from the terminally ill. Allan SM Wayne Law Rev; 1979 Nov; 26(1):139-72. PubMed ID: 11661826 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. In re living will. Havens SL Nova Law J; 1981; 5(3):445-70. PubMed ID: 11649552 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Do not resuscitate (no code blue) orders and the 1981 amendments to North Carolina's right to natural death statutes. Anderson JH; Bobbitt JD N C Med J; 1981 Dec; 42(12):A1-13. PubMed ID: 11643902 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. A comprehensive look at Connecticut's living will statute. Lieberson A Conn Probate Law J; 1992; 7(1):49-113. PubMed ID: 11653117 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. "Right to die" cases: a model for judicial decision-making? Webster WL N Y Law School Hum Rights Annu; 1990; 7(2):140-56. PubMed ID: 11652592 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. The right to die in peace: substituted consent and the mentally incompetent. Brant J Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1977; 11(4):959-73. PubMed ID: 11664849 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. The life support cases: myths and realities. Hartz JN Los Angel Lawyer; 1982; 5(5):18-20, 33, 52+. PubMed ID: 11653530 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Euthanasia, the right to die and privacy: observations on some recent cases. Riga PJ Linc Law Rev; 1980; 11(2):109-65. PubMed ID: 11658630 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Corbett v. D'Alessandro. Paulus SM Issues Law Med; 1986 Nov; 2(3):217-9. PubMed ID: 11644063 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. The role of the family in medical decisionmaking for incompetent adult patients: a historical perspective and case analysis. Krasik EB Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1987; 48(2):539-618. PubMed ID: 11658944 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. The Uniform Rights of the Terminally Ill Act: too little, too late? Chapman MA Ark Law Rev; 1989; 42(2):319-94. PubMed ID: 11653880 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. The right to die: an exercise of informed consent, not an extension of the constitutional right to privacy. Lyon EA Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1990; 58(4):1367-95. PubMed ID: 11659504 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. A patient's last rights: termination of medical care--an analysis of New York's In re Storar. Day K Albany Law Rev; 1982; 46(4):1380-413. PubMed ID: 11658533 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Pregnancy clauses in living will statutes. MacAvoy-Snitzer J Columbia Law Rev; 1987 Oct; 87(6):1280-300. PubMed ID: 11652510 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Withholding food and water from a patient--should it be condoned in California? Harber SM Pac Law J; 1985 Apr; 16(3):877-93. PubMed ID: 11652432 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. The right of the dying to refuse life prolonging medical procedures: the evolving importance of state constitutions. Marks TC; Morgan RC Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1992; 18(3):467-98. PubMed ID: 11654441 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. The Court's role in decisionmaking involving incompetent refusals of life-sustaining care and psychiatric medications. Parry JW Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1990; 14(6):468-76. PubMed ID: 11659325 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]