These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11653536)
1. Informed consent seen as ongoing process. Am Med News; 1984 Apr; 27(13):12-4. PubMed ID: 11653536 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The standard of disclosure by physicians to patients: competing models of informed consent. Halligan PD LA Law Rev; 1980; 41(1):9-67. PubMed ID: 11665275 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Informed consent: from disclosure to patient participation in medical decisionmaking. Simpson RE Northwest Univ Law Rev; 1981 Mar; 76(1):172-207. PubMed ID: 11658361 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Consent to medical treatment in Canada. Picard EI Osgoode Hall Law J; 1981 Mar; 19(1):140-51. PubMed ID: 11658624 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Oh, didn't I tell you? A look at informed consent. Greenwald AE Trial; 1982 Jun; 18(6):54-56, 85. PubMed ID: 11658483 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Doctors may reap lawsuits without informed consent. Med World News; 1984 Feb; 25(4):112-3. PubMed ID: 11645508 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Lawyer says MD has a duty to give sufficient information to patient when securing informed consent. Ob Gyn News; 1984 Jan 1-14; 19(1):34-5. PubMed ID: 11653541 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Tort--informed consent--new directions for medical disclosure--Hopp v. Lepp and Reibl v. Hughes. Gochnauer M; Fleming DJ Univ B C Law Rev; 1981; 15(2):475-97. PubMed ID: 11658641 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Informed consent in Canada: an empirical study. Part Two. Robertson G Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can; 1985 Mar; 18(2):125-30. PubMed ID: 11658805 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The lay standard of informed consent: theoretical and practical problems with Maryland's new cause of action. MD Law Rev; 1978; 38(2):320-65. PubMed ID: 11665126 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. 'Informed consent' to medical procedures. Skegg PD Med Sci Law; 1975; 15(2):124-32. PubMed ID: 11693128 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Patient consent in Louisiana. Dewey EP Loyola Law Rev; 1981; 27(4):1166-83. PubMed ID: 11658777 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Informed decision making: CMA policy summary. Canadian Medical Association CMAJ; 1986 Nov; 135(10):1208A-B. PubMed ID: 11658851 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Informed consent in Canada: an empirical study. Part One. Robertson G Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can; 1985 Jan; 18(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 11658769 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Following doctors' orders: informed consent in Australia. Manderson D Aust Law J; 1988 Jun; 62(6):430-40. PubMed ID: 11659118 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Informed consent in Texas: a proposal for reasonableness and predictability. Wallach DM; Berry SJ St Marys Law J; 1987 Nov; 18(3):835-82. PubMed ID: 11658921 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The doctrines of lack of consent and lack of informed consent in medical procedures in Louisiana. Boland GL LA Law Rev; 1983 Sep; 45(1):1-38. PubMed ID: 11658587 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Informed consent--a legal evaluation. Herbert V Cancer; 1980 Aug; 46(4):1042-4. PubMed ID: 11643602 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Toward an informed discussion of informed consent: a review and critique of the empirical studies. Meisel A; Roth LH Ariz Law Rev; 1983; 25(2):265-346. PubMed ID: 11658677 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The concept of informed consent in the United States, Canada, England and Australia: a comparative analysis. Monks SS Univ Qld Law J; 1993; 17(2):222-33. PubMed ID: 11659799 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]