These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11653590)

  • 21. Of mice and machine: a paradigmatic challenge to interpretation of the patent statute.
    Chiapetta JR
    William Mitchell Law Rev; 1994; 20(1):155-90. PubMed ID: 11652852
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Second thoughts about U.S. Patent #4,438,032.
    Burrows B
    Bull Med Ethics; 1997 Jan; No. 124():11-4. PubMed ID: 11655049
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Loopholes appear in genetic engineering patent.
    Yanchinski S
    New Sci; 1981 Sep; 91(1270):642. PubMed ID: 11664153
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Further attack on gene-splice tests.
    Miller JA
    Sci News; 1984 Jul; 126(4):55. PubMed ID: 11653588
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Research as intellectual property: influences within the university.
    Rosenzweig RM; Bremer HW
    Sci Technol Human Values; 1985; 10(2):41-54. PubMed ID: 11649680
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Biotechnology patents: new move confuses US patents world.
    Budiansky S
    Nature; 1983 Mar; 302(5905):199. PubMed ID: 11653442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Stanford draws a veil over DNA patent row.
    Anderson I
    New Sci; 1982 Dec; 96(1336):710. PubMed ID: 11655514
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Copyright in living genetically engineered works.
    Kayton I
    George Washington Law Rev; 1982 Jan; 50(2):191-218. PubMed ID: 11650705
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Leukaemia patient wants profits from his own blood.
    New Sci; 1984 Sep; 103(1422):4. PubMed ID: 11655639
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Proprietary rights and the norms of science in biotechnology research.
    Eisenberg RS
    Yale Law J; 1987 Dec; 97(2):177-231. PubMed ID: 11660398
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A matter of life and patents.
    Watts S
    New Sci; 1991 Jan; 129(1751):56-61. PubMed ID: 11659287
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Genetic engineers stitched up over patent rights.
    Dwyer P
    New Sci; 1982 Jul; 95(1313):75. PubMed ID: 11655440
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Push for royalties threatens use of Down syndrome test.
    Eichenwald K
    N Y Times Web; 1997 May; ():A1, D3. PubMed ID: 11647510
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Patenting of life forms.
    Pautler G
    Trial; 1982 Apr; 18(4):47-50, 76. PubMed ID: 11649513
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Patenting life.
    Kass LR
    Commentary; 1981 Dec; 72(6):45-57. PubMed ID: 11649383
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Moore v. Regents of the University of California.
    California. Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 4
    Wests Calif Report; 1988 Jul; 249():494-540. PubMed ID: 11648571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Patenting gene fragments.
    Agrawal A
    Econ Polit Wkly; 1993 May; 28(22):1089-93. PubMed ID: 11660270
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Gene-spliced corn field test postponed.
    Sci News; 1984 Jul; 126(4):61. PubMed ID: 11653589
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Patenting transgenic human embryos: a nonuse cost perspective.
    Burk DL
    Houst Law Rev; 1993; 30(4):1597-669. PubMed ID: 11659869
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. U.S. judge halts experiment in gene altering.
    Hilts PJ
    Washington Post; 1984 May; ():A1, A24. PubMed ID: 11646387
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.