BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

450 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11653592)

  • 1. PRO proposal jeopardizes confidentiality.
    Am Med News; 1984 Jul; 27(27):4. PubMed ID: 11653592
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Confidentiality of occupational medical records.
    American Medical Association. Board of Trustees
    Conn Med; 1981 Jul; 45(7):459-60. PubMed ID: 11643653
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Access to medical records, part 1: who may review a patient's medical record.
    Roach WH
    Top Health Rec Manage; 1981 Jun; 1(4):35-52. PubMed ID: 11645451
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The scarlet letter "A": AIDS in a computer society.
    van Dam MN
    Comput Law J; 1990 Apr; 10(2):233-64. PubMed ID: 11653972
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computerized medical records and the right to privacy: the emerging federal response.
    Boyer BB
    Buffalo Law Rev; 1975; 25(1):37-118. PubMed ID: 11664544
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Privacy of medical records.
    Association of the Bar of the City of New York. Committee on Federal Legislation
    Rec Assoc Bar City New York; 1980 Nov; 35(8):488-514. PubMed ID: 11649553
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Legal teeth for medical privacy?
    Med World News; 1977 Jul; 18(14):14-5. PubMed ID: 11661485
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Professional Standards Review Organization: some problems of confidentiality.
    Springer EW
    Utah Law Rev; 1975; 1975(2):361-80. PubMed ID: 11658319
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Medical privacy: threatened but fighting back.
    Patient Care; 1975 Jan; 9(1):108-109+. PubMed ID: 11661198
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Disclosure of patient health care records in Wisconsin.
    Lehner P
    Wis Bar Bull; 1984 Aug; 57(8):16-18, 70-71. PubMed ID: 11658813
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Absolutely not confidential.
    Norton C
    Hippocrates (Sausalito); 1989; 3(2):52-9. PubMed ID: 11650178
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Patient access to medical records in Washington.
    Madden JM
    Wash Law Rev; 1982 Nov; 57(4):697-713. PubMed ID: 11649659
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Medicare and Medicaid programs; advance directives; final rule.
    U.S. Health Care Financing Administration
    Fed Regist; 1995 Jun; 60(123):33261-94. PubMed ID: 11645304
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Confidentiality: a sacred trust under siege.
    Cotton P
    Med World News; 1989 Mar; 30(6):55-60. PubMed ID: 11645618
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Shifting sands: state laws redefine records accessibility.
    Friedman E
    Hospitals; 1981 Aug; 55(16):81-5. PubMed ID: 7250950
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Federal Privacy of Medical Information Act. [(Title provided[.
    Preyer R
    Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1979 Nov; 125(162):E5689-91. PubMed ID: 11661917
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Patient care management systems, medical records, and privacy: a balancing act.
    Hiller MD; Seidel LF
    Public Health Rep; 1982; 97(4):332-45. PubMed ID: 7111656
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Congressman Jack Kemp introduces the proposed Medical Records Privacy Act of 1974.
    Kemp J
    Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1974 Oct; 120(158):H10679-83. PubMed ID: 11661140
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. HCFA's palliative care study: is payment incentive enough?
    Stavish S
    Ann Intern Med; 1997 Jan; 126(2):I55-6. PubMed ID: 11644891
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Update: PSROs and confidentiality.
    Rogers J
    Med Rec News; 1976 Dec; 47(6):71-4. PubMed ID: 1036238
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.