These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11653633)

  • 1. Lords worry over Warnock.
    Russell W
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1984 Nov; 289(6454):1321. PubMed ID: 11653633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Commons debates Warnock report.
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1984 Dec; 289(6458):1639. PubMed ID: 11652438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Embryo research: British Commons vote for ban.
    Clarke M
    Nature; 1985 Feb; 313(6004):618. PubMed ID: 11658513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The start of a long debate on the Warnock report.
    Deitch R
    Lancet; 1984 Jul; 2(8396):238. PubMed ID: 11644288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reproductive technology: in Britain, the debate after the Warnock Report.
    Gillon R
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1987 Jun; 17(3):S16-8. PubMed ID: 11644023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Lords oppose embryo research.
    New Sci; 1984 Nov; 104(1429):6. PubMed ID: 11655672
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. House of Commons votes for ban on embryo research.
    Med World News; 1985 Apr; 26(7):30. PubMed ID: 11649605
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Government looks for guidance through Warnock minefield.
    Deitch R
    Lancet; 1984 Nov; 2(8411):1107-8. PubMed ID: 11644294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Recommendations of the Warnock Committee.
    Lancet; 1984 Jul; 2(8396):217-8. PubMed ID: 6146766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Warnock recommendations: Mr. Powell and his fellow opponents renew their campaign.
    Deitch R
    Lancet; 1985 Jul; 2(8447):166-7. PubMed ID: 11644449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990 -- a British case history for legislation on bioethical issues.
    Bolton V; Osborn J; Servante D
    J Int Bioethique; 1992 Jun; 3(2):95-101. PubMed ID: 11651386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Why Warnock's 14-day rule may be unworkable.
    Connor S
    New Sci; 1985 Jan; 105(1438):6. PubMed ID: 11658553
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Embryonic research.
    New Sci; 1984 Sep; 103(1423):2. PubMed ID: 11658549
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Britain's Lords debate embryo research.
    Cherfas J
    Science; 1989 Dec; 246(4937):1554-5. PubMed ID: 2595366
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assisted fertilization: legal restraints proposed for UK.
    Nature; 1984 Jul 26-Aug 1; 310(5975):266. PubMed ID: 6462211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Scientific research must have a moral basis.
    Warnock M
    New Sci; 1984 Nov; 104(1430):36. PubMed ID: 11658551
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Warnock report on human fertilisation and embryology.
    Wells WT
    Lancet; 1984 Sep; 2(8401):531-2. PubMed ID: 6147600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Test-tube embryology in the dock.
    Dickson D
    Science; 1984 Aug; 225(4662):606. PubMed ID: 6740327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Warnock fuels debate over 14-day rule.
    New Sci; 1984 Jul; 103(1414):3-4. PubMed ID: 11658480
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. New conception threatened by old morality.
    Sattaur O
    New Sci; 1984 Sep; 103(1423):12-7. PubMed ID: 11658548
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.