335 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11653640)
1. Regulating the environmental release of genetically engineered organisms: Foundation on Economic Trends v. Heckler.
Pendorf S
Fla State Univ Law Rev; 1985; 12(4):891-921. PubMed ID: 11653640
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Regulating biotechnology.
McGarity TO
Issues Sci Technol; 1985; 1(3):40-56. PubMed ID: 11649701
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Regulation of genetic engineering: less concern about Frankensteins but time for action on commercial production.
Karny GM
Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1981; 12(4):815-68. PubMed ID: 11649588
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The challenge of biotechnology.
Gore A; Owens S
Yale Law Policy Rev; 1985; 3(2):336-57. PubMed ID: 11652468
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Scientific uncertainty in regulating deliberate release of genetically engineered organisms: substantive judicial review and institutional alternatives.
Deatherage SD
HELR Harvard Environ Law Rev; 1987; 11(1):203-46. PubMed ID: 11650817
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Plan to end genetics panel troubles EPA.
Science; 1996 Aug; 273(5278):1035. PubMed ID: 11644823
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Corporate responsibility for recombinant DNA activities.
Berger BA
Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1981; 12(4):913-24. PubMed ID: 11649592
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Introduction to recombinant DNA research, development and evolution of the NIH guidelines, and proposed legislation.
Talbot B
Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1981; 12(4):804-14. PubMed ID: 11649587
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Biotechnology: can a new technology survive?
Withers WW; Kenworthy PG
St Louis Univ Law J; 1987; 31(3):673-97. PubMed ID: 11650845
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Another wrinkle in patchwork of US environmental release.
Ezzell C
Nature; 1988 Jan; 331(6152):107. PubMed ID: 11644300
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Regulating genetic engineering in an era of increased judicial deference: a proper balance of the federal powers.
Von Oehsen WH
Adm Law Rev; 1988; 40(3):303-44. PubMed ID: 11650827
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Why engineered organisms are safe.
Brill WJ
Issues Sci Technol; 1988; 4(3):44-50. PubMed ID: 11645609
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Gene-splice approvals on two fronts.
Miller JA
Sci News; 1985 Nov; 128(21):324. PubMed ID: 11653676
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Ethical and legal issues in patenting new animal life.
Dresser R
Jurimetrics; 1988; 28(4):399-435. PubMed ID: 11652544
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Firm gets NIH panel's approval for judge-barred DNA field test.
Hilts PJ
Washington Post; 1984 Jun; ():A1, A10. PubMed ID: 11646391
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Animal research: a call for legislative reform requiring ethical merit review.
Brody M
HELR Harvard Environ Law Rev; 1989; 13(2):423-84. PubMed ID: 11659214
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Foundation on Economic Trends v. Heckler.
U.S. Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Fed Report; 1985 Feb; 756():143-61. PubMed ID: 11648295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Does genetic engineering need genetic engineers?: should the regulation of genetic engineering include a new professional discipline?
Auchincloss S
Boston Coll Environ Aff Law Rev; 1993; 20(1):37-63. PubMed ID: 11652234
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Ice-minus bacteria: further snag and further delay.
Palca J
Nature; 1986 Mar; 320(6057):2. PubMed ID: 11645771
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Beyond Animal Legal Defense Fund v. Quigg: the controversy over transgenic animal patents continues.
Hecht EJ
Am Univ Law Rev; 1992; 41(3):1023-74. PubMed ID: 11652629
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
