BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11653650)

  • 1. Genetic engineering: Rifkin set back.
    Beardsley T
    Nature; 1985 Jul; 316(6025):183. PubMed ID: 11653650
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Gene-splice approvals on two fronts.
    Miller JA
    Sci News; 1985 Nov; 128(21):324. PubMed ID: 11653676
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rifkin challenges DNA implants in animals.
    Cross M
    New Sci; 1985 Jul; 107(1466):21. PubMed ID: 11655689
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Monsanto may bypass NIH in microbe test.
    Sun M
    Science; 1985 Jan; 227(4683):153. PubMed ID: 11643692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biotech guidelines challenged by Rifkin.
    Sun M
    Science; 1986 Aug; 233(4763):516. PubMed ID: 11643926
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. California field test goes forward.
    Crawford M
    Science; 1987 May; 236(4801):511. PubMed ID: 11643987
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. EPA approves field test of altered microbes.
    Sun M
    Science; 1985 Nov; 230(4729):1015-6. PubMed ID: 11643839
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Regulation of genetic engineering: less concern about Frankensteins but time for action on commercial production.
    Karny GM
    Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1981; 12(4):815-68. PubMed ID: 11649588
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biotech firm gets another black eye over experiment.
    Sun M
    Science; 1986 Mar; 231(4743):1242. PubMed ID: 11643907
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Genetic engineering: regulation issue is resurrected by EPA.
    Budiansky S
    Nature; 1983 Aug; 304(5927):572. PubMed ID: 11653487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biotech's stalled revolution.
    Schneider K
    N Y Times Mag; 1986 Nov; ():42-44, 47-48+. PubMed ID: 11649783
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Field test of gene-altered bacteria is approved.
    Boffey PM
    N Y Times Web; 1985 Nov; ():A17. PubMed ID: 11646468
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fuqua biotech bill sets stage for industry debate.
    Crawford M
    Science; 1986 Mar; 231(4745):1501. PubMed ID: 11643911
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. White House to release biotechnology guidelines.
    Sun M
    Science; 1986 Jun; 232(4755):1189. PubMed ID: 11643922
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Regulating biotechnology.
    McGarity TO
    Issues Sci Technol; 1985; 1(3):40-56. PubMed ID: 11649701
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Court rules against gene-splice field test.
    Miller JA
    Sci News; 1984 May; 125(21):325. PubMed ID: 11653546
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Regulatory structure for biotechnology proposed.
    Sun M
    Science; 1985 Jan; 227(4684):274. PubMed ID: 11643694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Regulating the environmental release of genetically engineered organisms: Foundation on Economic Trends v. Heckler.
    Pendorf S
    Fla State Univ Law Rev; 1985; 12(4):891-921. PubMed ID: 11653640
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Agency clears genetic researcher.
    Schneider K
    N Y Times Web; 1988 Jan; ():A18. PubMed ID: 11646628
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Further attack on gene-splice tests.
    Miller JA
    Sci News; 1984 Jul; 126(4):55. PubMed ID: 11653588
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.