95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11653651)
1. Ruling protects MDs who comply with patients wishing to end treatment.
Rust M
Am Med News; 1985 Jan; 28(2):1, 50. PubMed ID: 11653651
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The life support cases: myths and realities.
Hartz JN
Los Angel Lawyer; 1982; 5(5):18-20, 33, 52+. PubMed ID: 11653530
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Withholding life-prolonging medical treatment from the institutionalized person--who decides?
Corbett KA; Raciti RM
New Engl J Prison Law; 1976; 3(1):47-83. PubMed ID: 11664738
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. MDs, lawyers probe ethical, legal issues in ending treatment.
Bolsen B
Am Med News; 1984 Apr; 27(13):11-3. PubMed ID: 11653535
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Incompetents and the right to die: in search of consistent meaningful standards.
Strasser M
KY Law J; 1994-1995; 83(4):733-98. PubMed ID: 11654615
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Last rights: an analysis of refusal and withholding of treatment cases.
Brant J
Miss Law Rev; 1981; 46(2):337-70. PubMed ID: 11651657
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The role of the family in medical decisionmaking for incompetent adult patients: a historical perspective and case analysis.
Krasik EB
Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1987; 48(2):539-618. PubMed ID: 11658944
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Prolonging life and withdrawing treatment: legal issues.
Horan DJ; Grant ER
Linacre Q; 1983 May; 50(2):153-71. PubMed ID: 11653531
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Terminal care document.
Vermont
Vt Statut Annot Vt; 1981; Title 18 Chapter 111 Sections 5251 to 5262():. PubMed ID: 12041405
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Euthanasia, the right to die and privacy: observations on some recent cases.
Riga PJ
Linc Law Rev; 1980; 11(2):109-65. PubMed ID: 11658630
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Voluntary euthanasia: a proposed remedy.
Cole SS; Shea MS
Albany Law Rev; 1975; 39(4):826-56. PubMed ID: 11661204
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The "living will": the right to death with dignity?
Strand JG
Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1976; 26(2):485-526. PubMed ID: 11661320
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The right to die.
Kirven G
Ky Bench Bar; 1975 Jul; 39(3):16+. PubMed ID: 11664754
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The right to die in peace: substituted consent and the mentally incompetent.
Brant J
Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1977; 11(4):959-73. PubMed ID: 11664849
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Right-to-die damage actions: developments in the law.
Miller DH
Denver Univ Law Rev; 1988; 65(2-3):181-212. PubMed ID: 11659201
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. In re Storar: euthanasia for incompetent patients, a proposed model.
Haber JG
Pace Law Rev; 1983; 3(2):351-74. PubMed ID: 11658505
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Informed consent, termination of medical treatment, and the Federal Tort Claims Act: a new proposal for the military health care system.
Deardorff SE
Mil Law Rev; 1987 Jan; 115():1-120. PubMed ID: 11658904
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The legal aspects of medical euthanasia.
Meyers DW
Bioscience; 1973 Aug; 23(8):467-70. PubMed ID: 11660863
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The right to die: an exercise of informed consent, not an extension of the constitutional right to privacy.
Lyon EA
Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1990; 58(4):1367-95. PubMed ID: 11659504
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Right to decline life-prolonging procedures.
Florida
Wests Fla Statut Annot Fla; 1985; Sections 765.01 to 765.15(Suppl. Pamphlet):. PubMed ID: 12043654
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]