299 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11653676)
1. Gene-splice approvals on two fronts.
Miller JA
Sci News; 1985 Nov; 128(21):324. PubMed ID: 11653676
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Biotech's stalled revolution.
Schneider K
N Y Times Mag; 1986 Nov; ():42-44, 47-48+. PubMed ID: 11649783
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Court rules against gene-splice field test.
Miller JA
Sci News; 1984 May; 125(21):325. PubMed ID: 11653546
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Regulating biotechnology.
McGarity TO
Issues Sci Technol; 1985; 1(3):40-56. PubMed ID: 11649701
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Regulating the environmental release of genetically engineered organisms: Foundation on Economic Trends v. Heckler.
Pendorf S
Fla State Univ Law Rev; 1985; 12(4):891-921. PubMed ID: 11653640
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Genetic engineering: Rifkin set back.
Beardsley T
Nature; 1985 Jul; 316(6025):183. PubMed ID: 11653650
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. EPA approves field test of altered microbes.
Sun M
Science; 1985 Nov; 230(4729):1015-6. PubMed ID: 11643839
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Regulation of genetic engineering: less concern about Frankensteins but time for action on commercial production.
Karny GM
Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1981; 12(4):815-68. PubMed ID: 11649588
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Industry gene-splice field tests approved.
Miller JA
Sci News; 1984 Jun; 125(23):356. PubMed ID: 11653555
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Genetic engineering: regulation issue is resurrected by EPA.
Budiansky S
Nature; 1983 Aug; 304(5927):572. PubMed ID: 11653487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biotech guidelines challenged by Rifkin.
Sun M
Science; 1986 Aug; 233(4763):516. PubMed ID: 11643926
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. White House to release biotechnology guidelines.
Sun M
Science; 1986 Jun; 232(4755):1189. PubMed ID: 11643922
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Proposal for a coordinated framework for regulation of biotechnology.
U.S. Office of Science and Technology Policy
Fed Regist; 1984 Dec; 49(252):50856-907. PubMed ID: 11655658
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Firm gets NIH panel's approval for judge-barred DNA field test.
Hilts PJ
Washington Post; 1984 Jun; ():A1, A10. PubMed ID: 11646391
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Fuqua biotech bill sets stage for industry debate.
Crawford M
Science; 1986 Mar; 231(4745):1501. PubMed ID: 11643911
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The challenge of biotechnology.
Gore A; Owens S
Yale Law Policy Rev; 1985; 3(2):336-57. PubMed ID: 11652468
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Biotechnology regulation: White House holds the ring.
Beardsley T
Nature; 1985 Jan; 313(5998):85. PubMed ID: 11653580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Coordinated framework for regulation of biotechnology; establishment of the Biotechnology Science Coordinating Committee; notice.
U.S. Office of Science and Technology Policy
Fed Regist; 1985 Nov; 50(220):47174-95. PubMed ID: 11655733
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Biotechnology: new plans for regulation.
Beardsley T
Nature; 1985 Oct; 317(6036):373. PubMed ID: 11653653
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Further attack on gene-splice tests.
Miller JA
Sci News; 1984 Jul; 126(4):55. PubMed ID: 11653588
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
