260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11653729)
1. Different lessons from the Darsee affair?
Tynan M; Anderson RH
Int J Cardiol; 1984; 5(11):9-11. PubMed ID: 11653729
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Deceit in science: does it really matter?
Birch AJ
Interdiscip Sci Rev; 1990 Dec; 15(4):334-43. PubMed ID: 11651223
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The persistence of fraud in the literature: the Darsee case.
Kochan CA; Budd JM
J Am Soc Inf Sci; 1992 Aug; 43(7):488-93. PubMed ID: 11653988
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. British cast spotlight on misconduct in scientific research.
Altman LK
N Y Times Web; 1998 Jun; ():F3. PubMed ID: 11647563
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Redundant publication in biomedical sciences: scientific misconduct or necessity?
Jefferson T
Sci Eng Ethics; 1998 Apr; 4(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 11657769
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Research fraud, misconduct, and the IRB.
Hilgartner S
IRB; 1990; 12(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 11651971
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Illmensee responds.
Illmensee K
New Sci; 1984 Jun; 102(1413):40. PubMed ID: 11655647
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Illmensee denies forced resignation.
MacKenzie D
New Sci; 1985 Jul; 107(1465):17. PubMed ID: 11655699
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Procedures for Responding to Charges of Unethical Research Practices, Revised March 1985 Report of the Faculty Ad Hoc Committee to Investigate Research Fraud, 30 September 1986.
University of California, San Diego. School of Medicine
Minerva; 1987; 25(4):502-12. PubMed ID: 11650156
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. What do we know about fraud and other forms of intellectual dishonesty in science? Part 2: why does fraud happen and what are its effects?
Garfield E
Curr Contents Clin Med; 1987 Apr; 15(15):3-10. PubMed ID: 11649943
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Inappropriate authorship in collaborative science research.
Pennock RT
Public Aff Q; 1996 Oct; 10(4):379-93. PubMed ID: 11654653
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Scientific misconduct and editorial and peer review processes.
Fox MF
J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):298-309. PubMed ID: 11653366
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. New charges hit Illmensee.
MacKenzie D
New Sci; 1984 May; 102(1412):3-4. PubMed ID: 11655608
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Cheating in science and publishing.
Altman LK
CBE Views; 1981; 4(4):19-25. PubMed ID: 11649550
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The Darsee affair.
Cooledge HN; Hoffman RL; Hoffman SV
Harv Mag; 1983; 86(1):24-5. PubMed ID: 11653446
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Tobacco company set up network of sympathetic scientists.
Dyer C
BMJ; 1998 May; 316(7144):1555. PubMed ID: 11645059
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. How far do you trust your colleagues?
Neufeld A
New Sci; 1987 Jan; 113(1543):59. PubMed ID: 11655810
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Deception in scientific research.
Woolf PK
Jurimetrics; 1988; 29(1):67-95. PubMed ID: 11654908
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The exposure of a scientific fraud.
Swan N
New Sci; 1988 Dec; 120(1641):30-1. PubMed ID: 11655909
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee to Evaluate Research of Dr. John R. Darsee at Emory University.
Emory University. School of Medicine
Minerva; 1985; 23(2):276-305. PubMed ID: 11645860
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
