These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Ice-minus bacteria: further snag and further delay. Palca J Nature; 1986 Mar; 320(6057):2. PubMed ID: 11645771 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Rooftop gene test was illegal. New Sci; 1986 Apr; 109(1502):18. PubMed ID: 11655759 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Regulating the environmental release of genetically engineered organisms: Foundation on Economic Trends v. Heckler. Pendorf S Fla State Univ Law Rev; 1985; 12(4):891-921. PubMed ID: 11653640 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Regulating genetic engineering in an era of increased judicial deference: a proper balance of the federal powers. Von Oehsen WH Adm Law Rev; 1988; 40(3):303-44. PubMed ID: 11650827 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Field test of gene-altered bacteria is approved. Boffey PM N Y Times Web; 1985 Nov; ():A17. PubMed ID: 11646468 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Biotechnology: can a new technology survive? Withers WW; Kenworthy PG St Louis Univ Law J; 1987; 31(3):673-97. PubMed ID: 11650845 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Scientific uncertainty in regulating deliberate release of genetically engineered organisms: substantive judicial review and institutional alternatives. Deatherage SD HELR Harvard Environ Law Rev; 1987; 11(1):203-46. PubMed ID: 11650817 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Gene-altered bacteria released outdoors in a historic experiment. Schneider K N Y Times Web; 1987 Apr; ():1, 12. PubMed ID: 11646657 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. U.S. judge halts experiment in gene altering. Hilts PJ Washington Post; 1984 May; ():A1, A24. PubMed ID: 11646387 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. California field test goes forward. Crawford M Science; 1987 May; 236(4801):511. PubMed ID: 11643987 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Designer genes that don't fit: a tort regime for commercial releases of genetic engineering products. Harv Law Rev; 1987 Mar; 100(5):1086-105. PubMed ID: 11658845 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Court blocks field trial of spliced genes. Joyce C New Sci; 1984 May; 102(1411):7. PubMed ID: 11655607 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. New scandal halts gene engineers. Joyce C New Sci; 1986 Apr; 110(1503):21. PubMed ID: 11655767 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Mixed decision in gene-splice trial. Miller JA Sci News; 1985 Mar; 127(10):148-9. PubMed ID: 11653605 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Recombinant DNA: a case study in regulation of scientific research. Chalfant JC; Hartmann ME; Blakeboro A Ecol Law Q; 1979; 8(1):55-129. PubMed ID: 11665069 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The appeal of gene-splice field tests. Sci News; 1984 Dec 22-29; 126(25-26):397. PubMed ID: 11653596 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]