These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11653737)

  • 1. Biotech rules receive scrutiny.
    Kleist T
    Sci News; 1986 Aug; 130(5):71. PubMed ID: 11653737
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Industry gene-splice field tests approved.
    Miller JA
    Sci News; 1984 Jun; 125(23):356. PubMed ID: 11653555
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. US biological weapons: new test facility defended.
    Palca J
    Nature; 1986 Jun; 321(6073):805. PubMed ID: 11645772
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Regulating biotechnology.
    McGarity TO
    Issues Sci Technol; 1985; 1(3):40-56. PubMed ID: 11649701
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. White House unveils gene-splice policy.
    Raloff J
    Sci News; 1985 Jan; 127(1):7. PubMed ID: 11653593
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Field-test ups and downs.
    Sci News; 1986 Jun; 129(23):366. PubMed ID: 11653721
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Questions raised over how U.S. backed genetically altered virus.
    Schneider K
    N Y Times Web; 1986 Apr; ():A1, A20. PubMed ID: 11646465
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Court rules against gene-splice field test.
    Miller JA
    Sci News; 1984 May; 125(21):325. PubMed ID: 11653546
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. DNA panel has second thoughts: mandatory rules not yet to be abandoned.
    Dickson D
    Nature; 1982 Feb; 295(5849):447. PubMed ID: 11643710
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Regulation of genetic engineering: less concern about Frankensteins but time for action on commercial production.
    Karny GM
    Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1981; 12(4):815-68. PubMed ID: 11649588
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biotech guidelines challenged by Rifkin.
    Sun M
    Science; 1986 Aug; 233(4763):516. PubMed ID: 11643926
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Field test of gene-altered bacteria is approved.
    Boffey PM
    N Y Times Web; 1985 Nov; ():A17. PubMed ID: 11646468
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Administration divided over OECD biotech plan.
    Sun M
    Science; 1985 Aug; 229(4716):842-3. PubMed ID: 11643793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. UK revamps genetic engineering panel to focus on policy.
    Nature; 1996 Sep; 383(6596):114. PubMed ID: 11644801
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The NIH Guidelines for recombinant DNA research and the authority of FDA to require compliance with the Guidelines.
    Korwek EL
    Food Drug Cosmet Law J; 1980 Nov; 35(11):633-50. PubMed ID: 11661977
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Introduction to recombinant DNA research, development and evolution of the NIH guidelines, and proposed legislation.
    Talbot B
    Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1981; 12(4):804-14. PubMed ID: 11649587
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A case analysis of NEPA implementation: NIH and DNA recombinant research.
    Chalker SM; Catz RS
    Duke Law J; 1978 Mar; 1978(1):57-112. PubMed ID: 11661621
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Field tests inch toward EPA approval.
    Sci News; 1985 May; 127(18):280. PubMed ID: 11653636
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. You shall be as gods.
    Powledge TM
    Worldview; 1977 Sep; 20(9):45-7. PubMed ID: 11661489
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. NIH guidelines for research involving recombinant DNA molecules.
    Wilson DJ
    Account Res; 1993; 3(2-3):177-85. PubMed ID: 11652293
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.