These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11653748)
1. Whose child is this? Lacayo R Time; 1987 Jan; 129(3):56-8. PubMed ID: 11653748 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Surrogate motherhood and the marketplace. May WF Second Opin; 1988 Nov; 9():132-40. PubMed ID: 11650105 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The surrogate mother contract: in the best interests of society? Latourette AW Univ Richmond Law Rev; 1990; 25(1):53-92. PubMed ID: 11651389 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Status and contract in surrogate motherhood: an illumination of the surrogacy debate. Dolgin JL Buffalo Law Rev; 1990; 38(2):515-50. PubMed ID: 11650993 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Perspectives on surrogate motherhood. Little MO Med Humanit Rev; 1995; 9(2):38-45. PubMed ID: 11653303 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Surrogacy arrangements and the conflict of laws. Appleton SF Wis L Rev; 1990; 1990(2):399-482. PubMed ID: 11652060 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Womb to let. Gallagher M Natl Rev; 1987 Apr; 39(7):27-30. PubMed ID: 11649979 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Baby-sitting consideration: surrogate mother's right to "rent her womb" for a fee. Sly KM Gonzaga Law Rev; 1982-1983; 18(3):539-65. PubMed ID: 11658877 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Seven-week trial touched many basic emotions. Hanley R N Y Times Web; 1987 Apr; ():B2. PubMed ID: 11646174 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Surrogate mother agreements: contemporary legal aspects of a biblical notion. Townsend MD Univ Richmond Law Rev; 1982; 16(2):467-83. PubMed ID: 11658708 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Surrogate motherhood and the baby-selling laws. Katz A Columbia J Law Soc Probl; 1986; 20(1):1-53. PubMed ID: 11658800 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Designing an ethical frame for motherhood by contract. Eckholm E N Y Times Web; 1987 Jan; ():6E. PubMed ID: 11646160 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Surrogacy legislation in California: proposals and commentary. Davis AD Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1994; 28(3):571-92. PubMed ID: 11655175 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Contracts to bear a child: the mixed legislative signals. Wadlington WJ Ida Law Rev; 1992-1993; 29(2):383-410. PubMed ID: 11652308 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Surrogate parenthood: finding a North Carolina solution. Bartlett KT North Carol Centr Law J; 1989; 18(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 11659326 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Babies for sale. Fox R Public Interest; 1993; 11():14-40. PubMed ID: 11656370 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Selling the womb: can the feminist critique of surrogacy be answered? Lieber KB Indiana Law J; 1992; 68(1):205-32. PubMed ID: 11659688 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Surrogate law: the decision in a novel case in New Jersey could have wide-reaching implications for infertile couples and surrogate motherhood. Galen M Natl Law J; 1986 Sep; 9(3):1, 8, 10. PubMed ID: 11658784 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Some reflections on the Baby M case. Schuck PH Georgetown Law J; 1988 Jun; 76(5):1793-810. PubMed ID: 11649251 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Brokers downplay surrogacy ruling. Hanley R N Y Times Web; 1988 Feb; ():B5. PubMed ID: 11646650 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]