These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11653763)
1. The troubling question of 'fetal rights': should denying care to the unborn be a crime? Begley S; Wingert P; Huck J; Quade V Newsweek; 1986 Dec; 108(23):87. PubMed ID: 11653763 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Fetal operation opens up legal controversy. Anderson I New Sci; 1986 Oct; 112(1530):20. PubMed ID: 11655809 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Pregnant women and the duty to rescue: a feminist response to the fetal rights debate. Bennett B Law Context; 1991; 9():70-91. PubMed ID: 11660071 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Rethinking (m)otherhood: feminist theory and state regulation of pregnancy. Harv Law Rev; 1990 Apr; 103(6):1325-43. PubMed ID: 11656270 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A new crime, fetal neglect: state intervention to protect the unborn--protection at what cost? Manson R; Marolt J Calif West Law Rev; 1987-1988; 24(1):161-82. PubMed ID: 11650070 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Legal frameworks to prevent harm in-utero. Bewley S Med Law Int; 1994; 1(3):277-87. PubMed ID: 11652958 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The creation of fetal rights: conflicts with women's constitutional rights to liberty, privacy, and equal protection. Johnsen DE Yale Law J; 1986 Jan; 95(3):599-625. PubMed ID: 11658701 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A feminist response to 'Unborn child abuse: contemplating legal solution. Dawson TB Can J Fam Law; 1991; 9(2):157-76. PubMed ID: 11656495 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Courts acting to force care of the unborn. Lewin T N Y Times Web; 1987 Nov; ():A1, B10. PubMed ID: 11647835 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Court-ordered prenatal intervention: a final means to the end of gestational substance abuse. Flannery MT J Fam Law; 1991-1992; 30(3):519-604. PubMed ID: 11659750 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Forced medical treatment of pregnant women: "compelling each to live as seems good to the rest. Nelson LJ; Buggy BP; Weil CJ Hastings Law J; 1986 May; 37(5):703-63. PubMed ID: 11655855 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The fetus and the law--whose life is it anyway? Gallagher J Ms; 1984 Sep; 13(3):62, 64, 66+. PubMed ID: 11655606 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Prenatal invasions and interventions: what's wrong with fetal rights? Gallagher J Harv Womens Law J; 1987; 10():9-58. PubMed ID: 11649954 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Procreative liberty and the control of conception, pregnancy, and childbirth. Robertson JA Va Law Rev; 1983 Apr; 69(3):405-64. PubMed ID: 11651806 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Judicial intervention in pregnancy. Martin S; Coleman M McGill Law J; 1995 Aug; 40(4):947-91. PubMed ID: 11654475 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Reproductive responsibilities: rethinking the fetal rights debate. Burtt S Policy Sci; 1994; 27(2-3):179-96. PubMed ID: 11656483 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The ordeal of Pamela Rae Stewart. Bonavoglia A Ms; 1987; 16(1-2):92-95, 196-204. PubMed ID: 11649978 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Regulating women's bodies: the adverse effect of fetal rights theory on childbirth decisions and women of color. Krauss DJ Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev; 1991; 26(2):523-47. PubMed ID: 11652068 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Are fetal rights equal to infants'. Chambers M N Y Times Web; 1986 Nov; ():24E. PubMed ID: 11646229 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]