285 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11653766)
1. The editor and the IRB: should journals notify IRBs about possibly unethical research with human subjects?
Szidon JP; Swazey JP
IRB; 1986; 8(5):10-2. PubMed ID: 11653766
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Sharing scientific data I: new problems for IRBs.
Sieber JE
IRB; 1989; 11(6):4-7. PubMed ID: 11650286
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Ethical aspect of research involving elderly subjects.
Fletcher JC
J Clin Ethics; 1990; 1(4):285-6. PubMed ID: 11642836
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. On studying the powerful (or fearing to do so): a vital role for IRBs.
Sieber JE
IRB; 1989; 11(5):1-6. PubMed ID: 11650252
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Research fraud, misconduct, and the IRB.
Hilgartner S
IRB; 1990; 12(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 11651971
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Ethical considerations in the publication of the results of research involving human subjects.
Levine RJ
Clin Res; 1973 Oct; 21(4):763-7. PubMed ID: 11660968
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Should IRBs monitor research more strictly?
Christakis NA
IRB; 1988; 10(2):8-10. PubMed ID: 11650024
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Ethics of clinical trials for research ethics boards: proceedings of a national workshop.
National Council on Bioethics in Human Research (Canada)
NCBHR Commun; 1991; 2(2):4-23. PubMed ID: 11659919
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Ethics in medical research.
P N G Med J; 1973 Sep; 16(3):153-5. PubMed ID: 11661003
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Protocol review within the context of a research program.
Miller FG; Rosenstein DL
IRB; 1998; 20(4):7-10. PubMed ID: 11657088
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The wages of sin.
Pattullo EL
IRB; 1985; 7(5):7-8. PubMed ID: 11649753
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Scientific design, ethics, and monitoring: iRB review of randomized clinical trials.
Corwan DH
IRB; 1980 Nov; 2(9):1-4. PubMed ID: 11661884
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The design and conduct of randomized clinical trials.
Gordon RS
IRB; 1985; 7(1):1-3, 12. PubMed ID: 11649616
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Baby Fae and the media: how the law allows appropriate access.
Christakis N; Panner M
IRB; 1986; 8(2):5-7. PubMed ID: 11649750
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The Ethics of Human Experimentation: Reinventing the Research Ethics Board: Proceedings of a National Workshop held in Ottawa, Ontario, March 5-6, 1995.
National Council on Bioethics in Human Research (Canada)
NCBHR Commun; 1996; 7(1):5-35. PubMed ID: 11654527
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Ethical considerations in human experimentation.
Bernstein JE
J Clin Pharmacol New Drugs; 1975; 15(8-9):579-90. PubMed ID: 11661224
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Protecting and promoting the human research subject: a review of the function of research ethics boards in Canadian faculties of medicine.
National Council on Bioethics in Human Research (Canada). Working Group on Evaluation
NCBHR Commun; 1995; 6(1):3-32. PubMed ID: 11654937
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Medical and psychological experimentation on California prisoners.
Herch F; Flower R
Univ Calif Davis Law Rev; 1974; 7():351-84. PubMed ID: 11661107
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. "There is no substantive due process right to conduct human-subject research": the saga of the Minnesota Gamma Hydroxybutyrate Study.
Hammerschmidt DE
IRB; 1997; 19(3-4):13-5. PubMed ID: 11656944
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Inconsistency and IRBs: flaws in the Goldman-Katz study.
Levine RJ; Katz MD; Goldman J
IRB; 1984; 6(1):4-8. PubMed ID: 11649541
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
