149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11653799)
1. Coparticipant effects on subjects' decisions to consent for risk-involving research.
Finney PD
J Soc Psychol; 1984 Oct; 124(First half):35-41. PubMed ID: 11653799
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The informed consent dilemma: an empirical approach.
Michaels TF; Oetting ER
J Soc Psychol; 1979 Dec; 109(2):223-30. PubMed ID: 11665208
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Informed consent: I. The institutional non-liability clause as a liability in recruiting research subjects.
Trice AD; Ogden EP
J Soc Behav Pers; 1986; 1(3):391-6. PubMed ID: 11659090
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Enhancing comprehension of information for informed consent: a review of empirical research.
Silva MC; Sorrell JM
IRB; 1988; 10(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 11658988
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Attitudes toward the use of deception in psychologically induced pain.
Lustig BA; Coverdale J; Bayer T; Chiang E
IRB; 1993; 15(6):6-8. PubMed ID: 11654097
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. How (un)acceptable is research involving deception?
Smith CP
IRB; 1981 Oct; 3(8):1-4. PubMed ID: 11650527
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A confederate's perspective on deception.
Oliansky A
Ethics Behav; 1991; 1(4):253-8. PubMed ID: 11651141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Participants' understanding of the process of psychological research: informed consent.
Brody JL; Gluck JP; Aragon AS
Ethics Behav; 1997; 7(4):285-98. PubMed ID: 11655335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Perceived ethicality of guided imagery in rape research.
Korn JH; Huelsman TJ; Reed CK; Aiello M
Ethics Behav; 1992; 2(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 11651228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Deception in social research II: evaluating the potential for harm or wrong.
Sieber JE
IRB; 1983; 5(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 11649509
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Toward an informed discussion of informed consent: a review and critique of the empirical studies.
Meisel A; Roth LH
Ariz Law Rev; 1983; 25(2):265-346. PubMed ID: 11658677
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Research through deception.
Hunt M
N Y Times Mag; 1982 Sep; ():66-67, 138, 140+. PubMed ID: 11649613
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Extra credit for research subjects.
Cohen JM
IRB; 1982 Oct; 4(8):10-1. PubMed ID: 11651691
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Deception in medical and behavioral research: is it ever acceptable?
Wendler D
Milbank Q; 1996; 74(1):87-114. PubMed ID: 8596525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Participants' understanding of the process of psychological research: debriefing.
Brody JL; Gluck JP; Aragon AS
Ethics Behav; 2000; 10(1):13-25. PubMed ID: 11657907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Children's capacity to agree to psychological research: knowledge of risks and benefits and voluntariness.
Abramovitch R; Freedman JL; Henry K; Van Brunschot M
Ethics Behav; 1995; 5(1):25-48. PubMed ID: 11654169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. What kinds of subjects can understand this protocol?
Levine RJ
IRB; 1984; 6(5):6-8. PubMed ID: 11650664
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Ethical aspects of participating in psychology experiments: effects of anonymity on evaluation, and complaints of distressed subjects.
Britton BK; Richardson D; Smith SS; Hamilton T
Teach Psychol; 1983 Oct; 10(3):146-9. PubMed ID: 11650669
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Informed consent procedures in telephone interviews.
Singer E; Frankel MR
Am Sociol Rev; 1982 Jun; 47(3):416-27. PubMed ID: 11658359
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Protocol review within the context of a research program.
Miller FG; Rosenstein DL
IRB; 1998; 20(4):7-10. PubMed ID: 11657088
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
