408 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11653808)
1. When good scientists turn bad.
Roman MB
Discover; 1988 Apr; 9(4):50-55, 57-58. PubMed ID: 11653808
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Scientific misconduct: a form of white coat crime.
Kline S
J Pharm Law; 1993; 2(1):15-34. PubMed ID: 11653114
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Criminal liability for misconduct in scientific research.
Kuzma SM
Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1992; 25(2):357-421. PubMed ID: 11651584
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Misconduct in research: an issue of science policy and practice.
Chubin DE
Minerva; 1985; 23(2):175-202. PubMed ID: 11645859
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Scientific misconduct in academia: a survey and analysis of applicable law.
Sise CB
San Diego Law Rev; 1991; 28(2):401-28. PubMed ID: 11651628
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Too good to be true.
Colt GH
Harv Mag; 1983; 85(6):22-28, 54. PubMed ID: 11649472
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Policing fraud and deceit: the legal aspects of misconduct in scientific inquiry.
Protti M
J Infor Ethics; 1996; 5(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 11653390
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Deception in scientific research.
Woolf PK
Jurimetrics; 1988; 29(1):67-95. PubMed ID: 11654908
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Science police.
Dolnick E
Discover; 1994 Feb; 15(2):56-63. PubMed ID: 11653089
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Whistleblowing: a very unpleasant avocation.
Sprague RL
Ethics Behav; 1993; 3(1):103-33. PubMed ID: 11653080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fraud in research, 1986-1992: an annotated bibliography.
Anderson J
J Infor Ethics; 1994; 3(2):64-89. PubMed ID: 11656481
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Nobelist apologizes for defending research paper with faulty data.
Hilts PJ
N Y Times Web; 1991 May; ():1, 7. PubMed ID: 11646854
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Fraud squad moves in on universities.
Cross M; Connor S; Anderson I
New Sci; 1985 Jun; 106(1459):8. PubMed ID: 11655696
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Trouble in the laboratory: probing the science of a controversial paper.
Fackelmann KA
Sci News; 1990 Mar; 137(13):200-203, 205. PubMed ID: 11650334
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The assault on David Baltimore.
Kevles DJ
New Yorker; 1996 May; 72(13):94-98, 100-104, 106-109. PubMed ID: 11654450
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. New charges hit Illmensee.
MacKenzie D
New Sci; 1984 May; 102(1412):3-4. PubMed ID: 11655608
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Fraud and misrepresentation in research--whose responsibility?
Wigodsky HS
IRB; 1984; 6(2):1-5. PubMed ID: 11649536
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Conduct unbecoming?
Weiss P
N Y Times Mag; 1989 Oct; ():40-41, 68-69, 95. PubMed ID: 11650263
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Misconduct and social control in science: issues, problems, solutions.
Fox MF; Braxton JM
J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):373-83. PubMed ID: 11653368
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Questions of scientific responsibility: the Baltimore case.
Lang S
Ethics Behav; 1993; 3(1):3-72. PubMed ID: 11653082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
