These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Perspectives on surrogate motherhood. Little MO Med Humanit Rev; 1995; 9(2):38-45. PubMed ID: 11653303 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Whose child is this? Lacayo R Time; 1987 Jan; 129(3):56-8. PubMed ID: 11653748 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Who keeps 'Baby M'. Kantrowitz B Newsweek; 1987 Jan; 109(3):44-51. PubMed ID: 11653747 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Surrogate motherhood and the baby-selling laws. Katz A Columbia J Law Soc Probl; 1986; 20(1):1-53. PubMed ID: 11658800 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Modern reproductive technology and motherhood: the search for common ground and the recognition of difference. Birck ML Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1994; 62(4):1623-57. PubMed ID: 11660067 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Surrogate motherhood: attachment, attitudes and social support. Fischer S; Gillman I Psychiatry; 1991 Feb; 54():13-20. PubMed ID: 11654012 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Surrogate mother agreements: contemporary legal aspects of a biblical notion. Townsend MD Univ Richmond Law Rev; 1982; 16(2):467-83. PubMed ID: 11658708 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Baby-sitting consideration: surrogate mother's right to "rent her womb" for a fee. Sly KM Gonzaga Law Rev; 1982-1983; 18(3):539-65. PubMed ID: 11658877 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Surrogate law: the decision in a novel case in New Jersey could have wide-reaching implications for infertile couples and surrogate motherhood. Galen M Natl Law J; 1986 Sep; 9(3):1, 8, 10. PubMed ID: 11658784 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Legal, moral & international perspectives on surrogate motherhood: the call for a uniform regulatory scheme. Behm LL DePaul J Health Care Law; 1999; 2(3):557-603. PubMed ID: 12159903 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Most potential surrogate mothers deny they would feel loss. Ob Gyn News; 1981 Aug; 16(16):16. PubMed ID: 11653418 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Surrogacy legislation in California: proposals and commentary. Davis AD Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1994; 28(3):571-92. PubMed ID: 11655175 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Artificial insemination and the law. Jensen BJ Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1982; 1982(4):935-90. PubMed ID: 11658495 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Toward a new analysis of the abortion debate. Bell KL Ariz Law Rev; 1991; 33(4):907-35. PubMed ID: 11656167 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Contracts to bear a child. Erickson EA Calif Law Rev; 1978 May; 66(3):611-22. PubMed ID: 11662003 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Surrogate parenthood: finding a North Carolina solution. Bartlett KT North Carol Centr Law J; 1989; 18(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 11659326 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. A contractual analysis of surrogate motherhood and a proposed solution. York SG Loyola Los Angel Law Rev; 1991 Jan; 24(2):395-419. PubMed ID: 11651064 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Selling the womb: can the feminist critique of surrogacy be answered? Lieber KB Indiana Law J; 1992; 68(1):205-32. PubMed ID: 11659688 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]