These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

710 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11653828)

  • 1. Private medical records: are they public property? A survey of privacy, confidentiality and privilege.
    Kmentt KA
    Med Trial Tech Q; 1987; 33(3):274-307. PubMed ID: 11653828
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The physician-patient privilege--an impediment to public health.
    Goldberg BA
    Pac Law J; 1985 Apr; 16(3):787-804. PubMed ID: 11652431
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The scope of the physician-patient privilege in criminal actions: a new balancing test.
    Berney-Key S
    Neb Law Rev; 1985; 64(4):772-87. PubMed ID: 11649809
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The physician's dilemma: protection of the patient's right to privacy.
    Cooper AE
    St Louis Univ Law J; 1978; 22(3):397-432. PubMed ID: 11661810
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A drug addict's right to anonymity.
    DeSabato AA
    Villanova Law Rev; 1975 Mar; 20(4):800-36. PubMed ID: 11664514
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Behind closed doors: the confidentiality of psychotherapeutic records in Medicaid fraud investigations.
    Bassano PN
    Pace Law Rev; 1986; 6(3):441-94. PubMed ID: 11649846
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accommodating patient rights and computerized mental health systems.
    Gobert JJ
    North Carol Law Rev; 1976 Jan; 54(2):153-87. PubMed ID: 11664607
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Patient confidentiality and the criminal justice system: a critical examination of the new federal confidentiality regulations.
    Weissman JC; Berns BR
    Contemp Drug Probl; 1976; 5(4):531-52. PubMed ID: 11661456
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Confidences of malpractice plaintiffs: should their secrets be revealed?
    Turner JW
    South Tex Law Rev; 1987; 28(1):71-95. PubMed ID: 11650782
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Confidentiality: ethical and legal aspects for Canadian psychologists.
    Cram SJ; Dobson KS
    Can Psychol; 1993 Jul; 34(3):342-63. PubMed ID: 11652843
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Protecting the confidentiality of pretrial psychiatric disclosures: a survey of standards.
    N Y Univ Law Rev; 1976 Jun; 51(3):409-45. PubMed ID: 11664622
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. AIDS and the law of Virginia.
    Labowitz KE
    Geoge Mason Univ Civ Rights Law J; 1992; 3(1):67-112. PubMed ID: 11659881
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Studying fraud: is insurance claim information confidential?
    Holder AR
    IRB; 1990; 12(4):4. PubMed ID: 11651261
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ethical aspects of medical confidentiality.
    Walters L
    J Clin Comput; 1974; 4(1):9-20. PubMed ID: 11661092
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perspectives on patient confidentiality in the age of AIDS.
    Goode JS
    Syracuse Law Rev; 1993; 44(3):967-1001. PubMed ID: 11660175
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Confidential communications: the doctor-patient privilege.
    Harnon E
    Isr Law Rev; 1974 Apr; 9(2):292-302. PubMed ID: 11664347
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Patient-psychotherapist privilege: access to clinical records in the tangled web of repressed memory litigation.
    Loftus EF; Paddock JR; Guernsey TF
    Univ Richmond Law Rev; 1996 Jan; 30(1):109-54. PubMed ID: 11656851
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Legal issues: drug testing of postpartum women and newborns as the basis for civil and criminal proceedings.
    Moss KL
    Clgh Rev; 1990 Mar; 23(11):1406-14. PubMed ID: 11659232
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Constitutional law: does a privacy right protect a bar applicant's mental health records from complete disclosure? Florida Board of Bar Examiners, Re: Applicant, 443 So.2d 71 (Fla. 1983).
    Teagle BL
    Univ Fla Law Rev; 1984; 36(3):537-44. PubMed ID: 11649802
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Developments in the law; privileged communications. IV. Medical and counseling privileges.
    Harv Law Rev; 1985 May; 98(7):1530-55. PubMed ID: 11645572
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 36.