These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
1111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11653829)
21. Protection of persons undergoing biomedical research: Code of Public Health; Book IIA. France Bull Med Ethics; 1991 Mar; No. 66():8-11. PubMed ID: 11651087 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Considering experimentation and elusive truth: informed consent made difficult. Brodeur D Issues (St Louis Mo); 1992; 7(2):1-8. PubMed ID: 11659444 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. The protection of human subjects: an open letter to NIH. Reynolds PD Am Sociol; 1974 Nov; 9(4):221-5. PubMed ID: 11663254 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Protecting research subjects after consent: the case for the "research intermediary. Reiser SJ; Knudson P IRB; 1993; 15(2):10-1. PubMed ID: 11651567 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Compensating injured research subjects: I. The moral argument. Childress JF Hastings Cent Rep; 1976 Dec; 6(6):21-7. PubMed ID: 993009 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Ethics of volunteer research: the role of new EC guidelines. Haynes WG; Webb DJ Br J Clin Pharmacol; 1991 Dec; 32(6):671-6. PubMed ID: 1768558 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Fetal experimentation: legal implications of an ethical conundrum. Wilson JP Denver Law J; 1976; 53(4):581-642. PubMed ID: 11664590 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. The Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine of the Council of Europe. Dommel FW; Alexander D Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 1997 Sep; 7(3):259-76. PubMed ID: 11660358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Guidelines for medical research -- some ethical and legal problems. McHale JV Med Law Rev; 1993; 1(2):160-85. PubMed ID: 11660491 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Human experimentation. Protecting patient autonomy through informed consent. Tuthill KA J Leg Med; 1997 Jun; 18(2):221-50. PubMed ID: 9230568 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Standards of accountability for consent in research. Rubenstein LS Account Res; 1996; 4(3-4):197-206. PubMed ID: 11654515 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Guinea pigs on the payroll: the ethics of paying research subjects. Lemmens T; Elliott C Account Res; 1999; 7(1):3-20. PubMed ID: 11657561 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. An IRB member's perspective on access to innovative therapy. Moore DL Albany Law Rev; 1994; 57(3):559-81. PubMed ID: 11652854 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. IRBs and pharmaceutical company funding of research. Jellinek MS; Levine RJ IRB; 1982 Oct; 4(8):9-10. PubMed ID: 11651693 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. HEW proposed policy on the protection of human subjects: experimentation and the institutionalized mentally disabled. Wash Univ Law Q; 1975; 1975(3):745-74. PubMed ID: 11662989 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. An ethical framework for the practice of paying research subjects. Ackerman TF IRB; 1989; 11(4):1-4. PubMed ID: 11650243 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Medical research and treatment: ethical standards in the international context. Vennell MA Med Law Int; 1995; 2(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 11653224 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Medical and psychological experimentation on California prisoners. Herch F; Flower R Univ Calif Davis Law Rev; 1974; 7():351-84. PubMed ID: 11661107 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Medical experimentation: international rules and practice. Deutsch E Law Rev; 1989 Feb; 19(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 11659309 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]