78 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11653894)
1. A case study on the impact of clinically-observed abnormalities in mice with gallstones on the ethical admissibility of a projected experiment with gallstone-bearing mice.
Stafleu FR; Heeger FR; Beynen AC
ATLA Abstr; 1989 Dec; 17(2):101-8. PubMed ID: 11653894
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The influence of animal discomfort, human interest and scientific quality on the ethical acceptability of a projected animal experiment as assessed with questionnaires.
Stafleu FR; Baarda BD; Heeger FR; Beynen AC
ATLA Abstr; 1993 Apr; 21(2):129-37. PubMed ID: 11654042
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The ethical judgment of animal research.
Galvin SL; Herzog HA
Ethics Behav; 1992; 2(4):263-86. PubMed ID: 11651614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ethics and animals.
Zak S
Atl Mon; 1989 Mar; 263(3):68-74. PubMed ID: 11659112
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Ethical scores for animal experiments.
Porter DG
Nature; 1992 Mar; 356(6365):101-2. PubMed ID: 1545854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Institutional review boards as an instrument of assessment: research involving human subjects in the U.S.
Gray BH
Sci Technol Human Values; 1978; (25):. PubMed ID: 11663042
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Animal research: a call for legislative reform requiring ethical merit review.
Brody M
HELR Harvard Environ Law Rev; 1989; 13(2):423-84. PubMed ID: 11659214
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Ethical principles and guidelines for scientific experiments on animals.
;
Altern Lab Anim; 1997; 25(3):379-84. PubMed ID: 11654996
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The ethics of animal experimentation in the field of shock and trauma research.
Lewis DH
Acta Physiol Scand; 1986; 128(Suppl. 554):214-20. PubMed ID: 11649997
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Judging the ethical merit of clinical trials: what criteria do research ethics board members use?
Meslin EM; Lavery JV; Sutherland HJ; Till JE
IRB; 1994; 16(4):6-10. PubMed ID: 11654136
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The ethical thinking of animal researchers: problems and prospects.
Arluke A
New Biol; 1991 Jan; 3(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 2039765
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of three models for ethical evaluation of proposed animal experiments.
de Cock Buning T; Theune EP
Anim Welf; 1994 May; 3(2):107-28. PubMed ID: 11660271
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A case study in adolescent participation in clinical research: eleven clinical sites, one common protocol, and eleven IRBs.
Rogers AS; Schwartz DF; Weissman G; English A;
IRB; 1999; 21(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 11657967
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluating the morality of animal research: effects of ethical ideology, gender, and purpose.
Wuensch KL; Poteat GM
J Soc Behav Pers; 1998 Mar; 13(1):139-50. PubMed ID: 11657330
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Trapped in a guilt cage.
Arluke A
New Sci; 1992 Apr; 134(1815):33-5. PubMed ID: 11656105
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. An approach to pain in research animals.
Adams DB
ATLA Abstr; 1988 Dec; 16(2):145-54. PubMed ID: 11650853
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Human experimentation: the regulation controversy.
Society; 1975; 13(1):4-12. PubMed ID: 11662982
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Protecting and promoting the human research subject: a review of the function of research ethics boards in Canadian faculties of medicine.
National Council on Bioethics in Human Research (Canada). Working Group on Evaluation
NCBHR Commun; 1995; 6(1):3-32. PubMed ID: 11654937
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Animals, science, and ethics -- Section III. Critical anthropomorphism, animal suffering, and the ecological context.
Morton DB; Berghardt GM; Smith JA
Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(3):S13-9. PubMed ID: 11650362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. German scientists rail at animal welfare law.
MacKenzie D
New Sci; 1986 May; 110(1506):20. PubMed ID: 11655778
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
