BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

464 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11653980)

  • 1. Medical school guidelines for investigating misconduct and fraud in science.
    Annau Z
    Account Res; 1992; 2(3):179-87. PubMed ID: 11653980
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Deception in scientific research.
    Woolf PK
    Jurimetrics; 1988; 29(1):67-95. PubMed ID: 11654908
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Research universities and scientific misconduct -- history, policies, and the future.
    Steneck NH
    J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):310-30. PubMed ID: 11653367
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Institutional policies for responding to allegations of research fraud.
    Greene PJ; Durch JS; Horwitz W; Hooper VS
    IRB; 1986; 8(4):1-7. PubMed ID: 11653742
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A call for the development of "Good Research Practices" (GRP) guidelines.
    Glick JL; Shamoo AE
    Account Res; 1993; 2(4):231-5. PubMed ID: 11652143
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fraud will out--or will it?
    Tangney JP
    New Sci; 1987 Aug; 115(1572):62-3. PubMed ID: 11645775
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Research fraud, misconduct, and the IRB.
    Hilgartner S
    IRB; 1990; 12(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 11651971
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Character and the ethical conduct of research.
    Pellegrino ED
    Account Res; 1992; 2(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 11651456
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Inappropriate authorship in collaborative science research.
    Pennock RT
    Public Aff Q; 1996 Oct; 10(4):379-93. PubMed ID: 11654653
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Scientific misconduct and editorial and peer review processes.
    Fox MF
    J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):298-309. PubMed ID: 11653366
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Data audit by a regulatory agency: its effect and implication for others.
    Shapiro MF
    Account Res; 1992; 2(3):219-29. PubMed ID: 11653981
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Misconduct in science is not rare, a survey finds.
    Hilts PJ
    N Y Times Web; 1993 Nov; ():A22. PubMed ID: 11647007
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Which ethics for science and public policy?
    Irving DN; Shamoo AE
    Account Res; 1993; 3(2-3):77-100. PubMed ID: 11652298
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fraud and misrepresentation in research--whose rights?
    Schmaus W; Wigodsky HS
    IRB; 1984; 6(5):10-1. PubMed ID: 11650663
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The role of federal regulations in assuring research integrity.
    Friedman PJ
    Account Res; 1993; 3(2-3):111-6. PubMed ID: 11652290
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fraud and misconduct in clinical research.
    Wells F
    Account Res; 1997; 5(1-3):25-38. PubMed ID: 11654814
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Scientific misconduct in academia: a survey and analysis of applicable law.
    Sise CB
    San Diego Law Rev; 1991; 28(2):401-28. PubMed ID: 11651628
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Encouraging accountability in research: a pilot assessment of training efforts.
    Mastroianni AC; Kahn JP
    Account Res; 1999; 7(1):85-100. PubMed ID: 11657564
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The scientific community perspective on research integrity.
    Teich AH
    Account Res; 1993; 3(2-3):117-22. PubMed ID: 11652291
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Scientific misconduct: individual deviance or system complacency?
    Luft P; Sprague RL
    J Infor Ethics; 1996; 5(1):72-81. PubMed ID: 11653391
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.