These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
361 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11653988)
1. The persistence of fraud in the literature: the Darsee case. Kochan CA; Budd JM J Am Soc Inf Sci; 1992 Aug; 43(7):488-93. PubMed ID: 11653988 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Misconduct in science is not rare, a survey finds. Hilts PJ N Y Times Web; 1993 Nov; ():A22. PubMed ID: 11647007 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Different lessons from the Darsee affair? Tynan M; Anderson RH Int J Cardiol; 1984; 5(11):9-11. PubMed ID: 11653729 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Cheating in science and publishing. Altman LK CBE Views; 1981; 4(4):19-25. PubMed ID: 11649550 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Scientific misconduct and editorial and peer review processes. Fox MF J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):298-309. PubMed ID: 11653366 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Sharing scientific data I: new problems for IRBs. Sieber JE IRB; 1989; 11(6):4-7. PubMed ID: 11650286 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Deceit in science: does it really matter? Birch AJ Interdiscip Sci Rev; 1990 Dec; 15(4):334-43. PubMed ID: 11651223 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The exposure of a scientific fraud. Swan N New Sci; 1988 Dec; 120(1641):30-1. PubMed ID: 11655909 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Institutional policies for responding to allegations of research fraud. Greene PJ; Durch JS; Horwitz W; Hooper VS IRB; 1986; 8(4):1-7. PubMed ID: 11653742 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. British cast spotlight on misconduct in scientific research. Altman LK N Y Times Web; 1998 Jun; ():F3. PubMed ID: 11647563 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Procedures for Responding to Charges of Unethical Research Practices, Revised March 1985 Report of the Faculty Ad Hoc Committee to Investigate Research Fraud, 30 September 1986. University of California, San Diego. School of Medicine Minerva; 1987; 25(4):502-12. PubMed ID: 11650156 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. British editors form misconduct panel. Kaiser J Science; 1997 Aug; 277(5326):627. PubMed ID: 11644953 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Science, journalism, and whistle-blowing. Koshland DE Science; 1988 Apr; 240(4852):585. PubMed ID: 11644303 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Scientists retract embryo study, saying research was fraudulent. Angier N N Y Times Web; 1992 Jun; ():C3. PubMed ID: 11646943 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Fraud and secrecy: the twin perils of science. New Sci; 1983 Jun; 98(1361):712-3. PubMed ID: 11655551 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Redundant publication in biomedical sciences: scientific misconduct or necessity? Jefferson T Sci Eng Ethics; 1998 Apr; 4(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 11657769 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. What do we know about fraud and other forms of intellectual dishonesty in science? Part 2: why does fraud happen and what are its effects? Garfield E Curr Contents Clin Med; 1987 Apr; 15(15):3-10. PubMed ID: 11649943 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]