223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11654071)
1. Allegations of dishonesty in research and their treatment by American universities.
Mazur A
Minerva; 1989; 27(2-3):177-94. PubMed ID: 11654071
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Deception in scientific research.
Woolf PK
Jurimetrics; 1988; 29(1):67-95. PubMed ID: 11654908
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Misconduct in research: an issue of science policy and practice.
Chubin DE
Minerva; 1985; 23(2):175-202. PubMed ID: 11645859
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Fraud squad moves in on universities.
Cross M; Connor S; Anderson I
New Sci; 1985 Jun; 106(1459):8. PubMed ID: 11655696
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Procedures for Responding to Charges of Unethical Research Practices, Revised March 1985 Report of the Faculty Ad Hoc Committee to Investigate Research Fraud, 30 September 1986.
University of California, San Diego. School of Medicine
Minerva; 1987; 25(4):502-12. PubMed ID: 11650156
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Institutional policies for responding to allegations of research fraud.
Greene PJ; Durch JS; Horwitz W; Hooper VS
IRB; 1986; 8(4):1-7. PubMed ID: 11653742
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Too good to be true.
Colt GH
Harv Mag; 1983; 85(6):22-28, 54. PubMed ID: 11649472
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. New charges hit Illmensee.
MacKenzie D
New Sci; 1984 May; 102(1412):3-4. PubMed ID: 11655608
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Scientific misconduct in academia: a survey and analysis of applicable law.
Sise CB
San Diego Law Rev; 1991; 28(2):401-28. PubMed ID: 11651628
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Cheating in science and publishing.
Altman LK
CBE Views; 1981; 4(4):19-25. PubMed ID: 11649550
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Commentary: the university and research ethics.
Steneck NH
Sci Technol Human Values; 1984; 9(4):6-15. PubMed ID: 11649609
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Scientific misconduct: a form of white coat crime.
Kline S
J Pharm Law; 1993; 2(1):15-34. PubMed ID: 11653114
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The institutional context for research.
Berger EM; Gert B
Prof Ethics; 1995; 4(3-4):17-46. PubMed ID: 11655037
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Misconduct in science is not rare, a survey finds.
Hilts PJ
N Y Times Web; 1993 Nov; ():A22. PubMed ID: 11647007
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Fraud and misrepresentation in research--whose rights?
Schmaus W; Wigodsky HS
IRB; 1984; 6(5):10-1. PubMed ID: 11650663
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Misconduct and social control in science: issues, problems, solutions.
Fox MF; Braxton JM
J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):373-83. PubMed ID: 11653368
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. When good scientists turn bad.
Roman MB
Discover; 1988 Apr; 9(4):50-55, 57-58. PubMed ID: 11653808
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. How well do university researchers police themselves?: a case at Georgetown raises the question.
Weiser B
Washington Post; 1991 Jan; ():Health Su-13. PubMed ID: 11646786
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Research fraud, misconduct, and the IRB.
Hilgartner S
IRB; 1990; 12(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 11651971
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Questions of scientific responsibility: the Baltimore case.
Lang S
Ethics Behav; 1993; 3(1):3-72. PubMed ID: 11653082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
