These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

449 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11654132)

  • 1. UK Parliament enquires into genetics.
    Bull Med Ethics; 1994 Oct; No. 102():6-7. PubMed ID: 11654132
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. MPs call for tough controls on human genetics.
    Genethics News; 1995; No. 7():1, 3. PubMed ID: 11655124
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. All the (gene) news fit to print.
    Bull Med Ethics; 1995 Nov; No. 113():3-6. PubMed ID: 11660244
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. New genetic medicine and public opinion.
    Howse JL
    Forum Appl Res Public Policy; 1993; 8(3):29-33. PubMed ID: 11652663
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Legal and ethical considerations of the Human Genome Project.
    McLean SA; Giesen D
    Med Law Int; 1994; 1(2):159-75. PubMed ID: 11653112
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ethical and social implications of the Human Genome Project: the issues in the UK.
    Stewart AC
    Sci Public Policy; 1991 Apr; 18(2):123-9. PubMed ID: 11659901
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Human Genome Project: bibliography of ethical, social, legal, and scientific aspects.
    Arizona State University Center for the Study of Law, Science and Technology
    Jurimetrics; 1992; 32(2):223-311. PubMed ID: 11659418
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Future fall-out from the genetic revolution.
    Bohrer RA
    Futures; 1992 Sep; 24(7):681-8. PubMed ID: 11659559
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Genetic selection of offspring characteristics.
    Robertson JA
    Boston Univ Law Rev; 1996 Jun; 76(3):421-82. PubMed ID: 11660289
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Human Genome Project: a challenge to the human rights framework.
    Iles AT
    Harv Hum Rights J; 1996; 9():27-60. PubMed ID: 11660498
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Map, myth, or medium of redemption: how do we interpret the Human Genome Project?
    Lysaught MT
    Second Opin; 1994 Apr; 19(4):76-84. PubMed ID: 11645259
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A legal research agenda for the Human Genome Initiative.
    Karjala DS
    Jurimetrics; 1992; 32(2):121-222. PubMed ID: 11659417
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reprogenetics policy: three kinds of models.
    Nordgren A
    Community Genet; 1998; 1(2):61-70. PubMed ID: 11657630
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Beyond abortion: human genetics and the new eugenics.
    Harding JR
    Pepperdine Law Rev; 1991; 18(1):471-512. PubMed ID: 11659992
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Whose genome project?
    Macer D
    Bioethics; 1991 Jul; 5(3):183-211. PubMed ID: 11659339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. International Workshop on Legal Aspects of the Human Genome Project (Bilbao, 24-26 May 1993) adopts Bilbao Declaration.
    Int Dig Health Legis; 1994; 45(2):234-7. PubMed ID: 11659960
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Genethics in the mid-1990s.
    Genethics News; 1996; 13():6-7. PubMed ID: 11660393
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Don't ban genetic engineering.
    Capron AM
    Washington Post; 1983 Jun; ():A29. PubMed ID: 11646283
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Public of 2 minds on genetic shifts.
    Schneider K
    N Y Times Web; 1987 May; ():21. PubMed ID: 11646570
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mapping the human genome: some thoughts for those who say "There should be a law on it.
    Skene L
    Bioethics; 1991 Jul; 5(3):233-49. PubMed ID: 11659341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.