193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11654156)
1. Ten legal myths about advance medical directives.
Sabatino CP
Clgh Rev; 1994 Oct; 28(6):653-6. PubMed ID: 11654156
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Legislative trends in nonjudicial surrogate health care decision making.
Vignery B
Clgh Rev; 1989; 23(4):422-5. PubMed ID: 11653878
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Alzheimer's: decisions in terminal care.
Cassel CK; Hays JR; Lynn J
Patient Care; 1991 Nov; 25(18):125-37. PubMed ID: 11659603
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Terminal care document.
Vermont
Vt Statut Annot Vt; 1981; Title 18 Chapter 111 Sections 5251 to 5262():. PubMed ID: 12041405
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Decisionmaking in authorizing and withholding life sustaining medical treatment: from Quinlan to Cruzan.
Keilitz I; Bilzor JC; Hafemeister TL; Brown V; Dudyshyn D
Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1989; 13(5):482-93. PubMed ID: 11654759
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A model integrated advance directive for health care unto the third generation.
Weisbard AJ
Bioeth Bull; 1995; 4(2):2-12. PubMed ID: 11759721
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Second-generation advance directives: will reforming the law improve the practice?
Keyserlingk EW
Humane Med; 1993 Jan; 9(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 11652942
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Indiana's new health care consent act: a guiding light for the health care provider.
Thompson WH
Indiana Law Rev; 1988; 21(1):181-203. PubMed ID: 11659030
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The Court's role in decisionmaking involving incompetent refusals of life-sustaining care and psychiatric medications.
Parry JW
Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1990; 14(6):468-76. PubMed ID: 11659325
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The living will--death with dignity or mechanical vitality.
Wilson PH
Cumberland Law Rev; 1979; 10(1):163-207. PubMed ID: 11661825
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws develops Uniform Health-Care Decisions Act.
Int Dig Health Legis; 1995; 46(4):563-70. PubMed ID: 11657359
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Incompetents and the right to die: in search of consistent meaningful standards.
Strasser M
KY Law J; 1994-1995; 83(4):733-98. PubMed ID: 11654615
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Medical treatment rights of older persons and persons with disabilities.
National Legal Center for the Medically Dependent and Disabled
Clgh Rev; 1992 Jan; 25(9):1204-17. PubMed ID: 11659393
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. New Jersey Advance Directives for Health Care Act.
New Jersey
N J Statut Annot N J; 1991 Jul; Chapt. 201 Sects. 26.2H.53 to 26.2H.78():26:2H-53 to 26:2H-78. PubMed ID: 12043617
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The faulty promise of living wills.
Carey J
US News World Rep; 1989 Jul; 107(4):63-4. PubMed ID: 11653855
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Legal group looks for uniformity in life-and-death treatment choices.
Moskowitz DB
J Am Health Policy; 1993; 3(4):49-52. PubMed ID: 10127500
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A time to live, a time to die.
Stiefel LS
Akron Law Rev; 1991; 24(3-4):699-741. PubMed ID: 16144097
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Experimenting with the "right to die" in the laboratory of the states.
Eaton TA; Larson EJ
Georgia Law Rev; 1991; 25(5):1253-326. PubMed ID: 12569937
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Hospitals will now ask patients if they wish to make death plan.
Belkin L
N Y Times Web; 1991 Dec; ():1, 47. PubMed ID: 11646912
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Paper shields: why advance directives still don't work.
McGee G
Princet J Bioeth; 1998; 1(1):42-57. PubMed ID: 11657337
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
