These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Reproductive rights and the Human Genome Project. Walsh J South Calif Rev Law Womens Stud; 1994; 4(1):145-81. PubMed ID: 11660643 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Medical decision making during a surrogate pregnancy. Mayo TW Houst Law Rev; 1988 May; 25(3):599-644. PubMed ID: 11649257 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The search for coherence in reproductive policy. Merz JF J Leg Med; 1996 Mar; 17(1):169-76. PubMed ID: 11644847 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Silent no more: physicians' legal and ethical obligations to patients seeking abortions. Law SA Rev Law Soc Change; 1994-1995; 21(2):279-321. PubMed ID: 11660619 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Choices and rights: eugenics, genetics and disability equality. Shakespeare T Disabil Soc; 1998 Nov; 13(5):665-81. PubMed ID: 11660717 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Pregnancy and AIDS. Field MA MD Law Rev; 1993; 52(2):402-36. PubMed ID: 11659754 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Rethinking (m)otherhood: feminist theory and state regulation of pregnancy. Harv Law Rev; 1990 Apr; 103(6):1325-43. PubMed ID: 11656270 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Legal implications of amniocentesis. Friedman JM Univ PA Law Rev; 1974 Nov; 123(1):92-156. PubMed ID: 11664320 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Sophie's choices: medical and legal responses to suffering. Shepherd L Notre Dame Law Rev; 1996; 72(1):103-56. PubMed ID: 11660669 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The triple screen in prenatal care: not just a simple blood test. Wagner AF; Wagner AM Trends Health Care Law Ethics; 1994; 9(3):33-8. PubMed ID: 11652975 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Prenatal screening, autonomy and reasons: the relationship between the law of abortion and wrongful birth. Scott R Med Law Rev; 2003; 11(3):265-325. PubMed ID: 16733877 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Reed v. Campagnolo. Maryland. Court of Appeals Atl Report; 1993 Sep; 630():1145-54. PubMed ID: 11648626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The law's response to reproductive genetic testing: questioning assumptions about choice, causation and control. Rothenberg KH Fetal Diagn Ther; 1993 Apr; 8(Suppl. 1):160-3. PubMed ID: 11653015 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The judge in the delivery room: the emergence of court-ordered cesareans. Rhoden NK Calif Law Rev; 1986 Dec; 74(6):1951-2030. PubMed ID: 11658950 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Ethics, law, and medical genetics: after the human genome is mapped. Fletcher JC; Wertz DC Emory Law J; 1990; 39(3):747-809. PubMed ID: 11653908 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Minnesota's "crack baby" law: weapon of war or link in a chain? Johnson JM Law Inequal; 1990 Jul; 8(3):485-531. PubMed ID: 11651347 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Pregnant women and the duty to rescue: a feminist response to the fetal rights debate. Bennett B Law Context; 1991; 9():70-91. PubMed ID: 11660071 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Control of childbearing by HIV-positive women: some responses to emerging legal policies. Sangree S Buffalo Law Rev; 1993; 41(2):309-449. PubMed ID: 11659735 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]