These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

306 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11654267)

  • 1. A survey of university institutional review boards: characteristics, policies, and procedures.
    Hayes GJ; Hayes SC; Dykstra T
    IRB; 1995; 17(3):1-6. PubMed ID: 11654267
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Protecting and promoting the human research subject: a review of the function of research ethics boards in Canadian faculties of medicine.
    National Council on Bioethics in Human Research (Canada). Working Group on Evaluation
    NCBHR Commun; 1995; 6(1):3-32. PubMed ID: 11654937
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Judging the ethical merit of clinical trials: what criteria do research ethics board members use?
    Meslin EM; Lavery JV; Sutherland HJ; Till JE
    IRB; 1994; 16(4):6-10. PubMed ID: 11654136
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Commission says institutional review boards should change procedures now.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 1999 Jan; 14(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 11657555
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Institutional review boards (IRBs) and conflict of interest.
    Shamoo AE
    Account Res; 1999; 7(2-4):201-12. PubMed ID: 11658176
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Toward a more comprehensive approach to protecting human subjects: the interface of data safety monitoring boards and institutional review boards in randomized clinical trials.
    Gordon VM; Sugarman J; Kass N
    IRB; 1998; 20(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 11655324
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. National commission proposes numerous new regulations of institutional review boards.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 1998 Oct; 13(10):1-2. PubMed ID: 11657739
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Half-full or half-empty? Evaluating IRB performance.
    Mishkin B; Ariand N
    Prof Ethics Rep; 1998; 11(3):4-7. PubMed ID: 11657925
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A protocol review guide to reduce IRB inconsistency.
    Prentice ED; Antonson DL
    IRB; 1987; 9(1):9-11. PubMed ID: 11649892
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dilemmas in paying for clinical research: the view from the IRB.
    Lind SE
    IRB; 1987; 9(2):1-5. PubMed ID: 11649900
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Guide to decision-making in institutional review of proposals for human experimentation.
    Himmelsbach CK
    Man Med; 1978; 3(3):201-220. PubMed ID: 12085911
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hyperbaric research at Duke University--ethical considerations.
    Bennett PB; Kylstra JA
    Forsvarsmedicin; 1973; 9(3):373-8. PubMed ID: 11661280
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Ethics of Human Experimentation: Reinventing the Research Ethics Board: Proceedings of a National Workshop held in Ottawa, Ontario, March 5-6, 1995.
    National Council on Bioethics in Human Research (Canada)
    NCBHR Commun; 1996; 7(1):5-35. PubMed ID: 11654527
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Institutional review boards in the university setting: review of pharmaceutical testing protocols, informed consent and ethical concerns.
    Kobasic DM
    J Coll Univ Law; 1988; 15(2):185-216. PubMed ID: 11659168
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Resolving Beecher's paradox: getting beyond IRB reform.
    Koski G
    Account Res; 1999; 7(2-4):213-25. PubMed ID: 11658177
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reporting the outcome of ethics review.
    Scott G; Goode K
    Bull Med Ethics; 1995 Aug; No. 110():16-8. PubMed ID: 11653216
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Undergraduate research and the institutional review board: a mismatch or happy marriage?
    Kallgren CA; Tauber RT
    Teach Psychol; 1996 Feb; 23(1):20-5. PubMed ID: 11655063
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Institutional review boards as an instrument of assessment: research involving human subjects in the U.S.
    Gray BH
    Sci Technol Human Values; 1978; (25):. PubMed ID: 11663042
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Continuing review of research involving human subjects: approach to the problem and remaining areas of concern.
    Gordon B; Prentice E
    IRB; 1997; 19(2):8-11. PubMed ID: 11655323
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Human experimentation: the review process in practice.
    Cowan DH
    Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1975; 25(3):533-64. PubMed ID: 11661165
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.