These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11654313)
21. An introduction to research ethics. Friedman PJ Sci Eng Ethics; 1996 Oct; 2(4):443-56. PubMed ID: 11657731 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Deceit in science: does it really matter? Birch AJ Interdiscip Sci Rev; 1990 Dec; 15(4):334-43. PubMed ID: 11651223 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Responsibilities of awardee and applicant institutions for dealing with and reporting possible misconduct in science; final rule. US Public Health Service Fed Regist; 1989 Aug; 54(151):32446-51. PubMed ID: 11651184 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Nobelist apologizes for defending research paper with faulty data. Hilts PJ N Y Times Web; 1991 May; ():1, 7. PubMed ID: 11646854 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee to Evaluate Research of Dr. John R. Darsee at Emory University. Emory University. School of Medicine Minerva; 1985; 23(2):276-305. PubMed ID: 11645860 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. British cast spotlight on misconduct in scientific research. Altman LK N Y Times Web; 1998 Jun; ():F3. PubMed ID: 11647563 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Procedures for Responding to Charges of Unethical Research Practices, Revised March 1985 Report of the Faculty Ad Hoc Committee to Investigate Research Fraud, 30 September 1986. University of California, San Diego. School of Medicine Minerva; 1987; 25(4):502-12. PubMed ID: 11650156 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Perceptions concerning research integrity and the practice of data audit in the biotechnology industry. Glick JL Account Res; 1993; 3(2-3):187-95. PubMed ID: 11652294 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Fraud squad moves in on universities. Cross M; Connor S; Anderson I New Sci; 1985 Jun; 106(1459):8. PubMed ID: 11655696 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Move to make it harder to fabricate medical research. Med World News; 1983 Jan; 24(2):17, 21. PubMed ID: 11645487 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Scientific misconduct: a form of white coat crime. Kline S J Pharm Law; 1993; 2(1):15-34. PubMed ID: 11653114 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. When good scientists turn bad. Roman MB Discover; 1988 Apr; 9(4):50-55, 57-58. PubMed ID: 11653808 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Whistleblowing: a very unpleasant avocation. Sprague RL Ethics Behav; 1993; 3(1):103-33. PubMed ID: 11653080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. No misconduct or fraud in Baltimore case. Anderson A Nature; 1988 Dec; 336(6199):505. PubMed ID: 11644320 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Criminal liability for misconduct in scientific research. Kuzma SM Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1992; 25(2):357-421. PubMed ID: 11651584 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. The scientific community perspective on research integrity. Teich AH Account Res; 1993; 3(2-3):117-22. PubMed ID: 11652291 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. US breast cancer research inquiry. Horton R Lancet; 1994 Jun; 343(8911):1493. PubMed ID: 11644601 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. The assault on David Baltimore. Kevles DJ New Yorker; 1996 May; 72(13):94-98, 100-104, 106-109. PubMed ID: 11654450 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Dealing with research misconduct in the United Kingdom. Deception: difficulties and initiatives. Chantler C; Chantler S BMJ; 1998 Jun; 316(7146):1731-2. PubMed ID: 9652923 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]