380 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11654353)
1. The America we seek: a statement of pro-life principle and concern.
Agee MC; Argue D; Arkes H
First Things; 1996 May; 63():40-4. PubMed ID: 11654353
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Testimony opposing "Freedom of Choice Act.
Alvare H;
Origins; 1992 Apr; 21(43):692-6. PubMed ID: 11656134
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Abortion, absolutism, and compromise.
Carter SL
Yale Law J; 1991 Jun; 100(8):2747-66. PubMed ID: 11656152
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Mediating the polar extremes: a guide to post-Webster abortion policy.
Wilkins RG; Sherlock R; Clark S
Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1991; 1991(1):403-87. PubMed ID: 11656173
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. How not to promote serious deliberation about abortion.
McConnell MW
Univ Chic Law Rev; 1991; 58(3):1181-202. PubMed ID: 11656153
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Abortion rights in America.
Bullock JR
Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1994; 1994(1):63-94. PubMed ID: 11656488
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The Supreme Court on abortion funding: the second time around.
Horan DJ; Marzen TJ
St Louis Univ Law J; 1981; 25(2):411-27. PubMed ID: 11655812
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Judicial supremacy, right-to-life and the abortion decision.
Lindholm LM
Public Aff Q; 1988 Apr; 2(2):1-20. PubMed ID: 11651912
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Abortion: a misplaced debate.
Brockway AR
Engage Soc Action; 1974 Feb; 2(2):33-47. PubMed ID: 11663497
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Rethinking Roe v. Wade.
Wardle LD
Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1985; 1985(2):231-64. PubMed ID: 11655792
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Killing "the handicapped" -- before and after birth.
Field MA
Harv Womens Law J; 1993; 16():79-138. PubMed ID: 11652872
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The politics of abortion.
Gearty C
J Law Soc; 1992; 19(4):441-53. PubMed ID: 11656230
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Rationalizing the abortion debate: legal rhetoric and the abortion controversy.
Chemerinsky E
Buffalo Law Rev; 1982; 31(1):107-64. PubMed ID: 11655711
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Revisiting Roe v. Wade: substance and process in the abortion debate.
Farrell MG
Indiana Law J; 1993; 68(2):269-362. PubMed ID: 11656341
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Abortion, ethics, and the common good: Who are we? What do we want? How do we get there?
Araujo RJ
Marquette Law Rev; 1993; 76():701-54. PubMed ID: 11659963
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The future of abortion.
McDaniel A
Newsweek; 1989 Jul; 114(3):14-21, 24-27. PubMed ID: 11655929
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The battle over abortion.
Salholz E
Newsweek; 1989 May; 113(18):28-32, 34-36, 38. PubMed ID: 11659104
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Feminist litigation: an oxymoron? -- a study of the briefs filed in William L. Webster v. Reproductive Health Services.
Colker R
Harv Womens Law J; 1990; 13():137-88. PubMed ID: 11656053
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The new pro-life legislation: patterns and recommendations.
Witherspoon JP
St Marys Law J; 1976; 7(4):637-97. PubMed ID: 11664635
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Resolving the abortion debate: compromise legislation, an analysis of the abortion policies of the United States, France and Germany.
Hertberg BL
Suffolk Transnatl Law R; 1993; 16(2):513-70. PubMed ID: 11659765
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
