BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

380 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11654353)

  • 21. The Pennsylvania abortion case.
    Benshoof J
    Touro Law Rev; 1993; 9(2):217-49. PubMed ID: 11656382
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Living with Roe v. Wade.
    McConnell ML
    Commentary; 1990 Nov; 90(5):34-8. PubMed ID: 11656047
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The limits of judicial intervention in abortion politics.
    Tatalovich R; Daynes BW
    Christ Century; 1982 Jan 6-13; 99(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 11655445
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The invalidity of Canada's abortion law--section 251 of the Criminal Code.
    Picher PC
    Crim Rep Can New Ser; 1974; 24():1-31. PubMed ID: 11663529
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Reconciling reason and religion: on Dworkin and religious freedom.
    Stacy T
    George Washington Law Rev; 1994 Nov; 63(1):1-75. PubMed ID: 11660276
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Oh my God, I'm pregnant.
    Minter CV
    Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1973; 1(1):119-29. PubMed ID: 11663469
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The abortion cases: a study in law and social change.
    Rubin ER
    North Carol Centr Law J; 1974; 5(2):215-53. PubMed ID: 11663476
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Notes from the field: a reply to Professor Colker.
    Burns SE
    Harv Womens Law J; 1990; 13():189-206. PubMed ID: 11656054
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. "Social abortion" pre and post Webster.
    Bannon AE; Nigro SA
    State Health Legis Rep; 1989 Dec; 17(4):9-19. PubMed ID: 11655955
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A decision-theoretic reconstruction of Roe v. Wade.
    Lockhart T
    Public Aff Q; 1991 Jul; 5(3):243-58. PubMed ID: 11656064
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Ending the abortion war: a modest proposal.
    Kissling F
    Christ Century; 1990 Feb; 107(6):180-4. PubMed ID: 11655989
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Unraveling compromise.
    Olsen F
    Harv Law Rev; 1989 Nov; 103(1):105-35. PubMed ID: 11655993
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The forest and the trees: Roe v. Wade and its critics.
    Heymann PB; Barzelay DE
    Boston Univ Law Rev; 1973 Jul; 53(4):765-84. PubMed ID: 11663362
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Impact of the abortion decisions upon the father's role.
    Witherspoon JP
    Jurist; 1975; 35(1):32-65. PubMed ID: 11664577
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Abortion and the Constitution: the need for a life-protective amendment.
    Destro RA
    Calif Law Rev; 1975 Sep; 63(5):1250-351. PubMed ID: 11663611
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Roe v. Wade and the traditional legal standards concerning pregnancy.
    Hopkin WR
    Temple Law Q; 1974; 47(4):715-38. PubMed ID: 11664349
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The tension between individual and political ethics: morality, public policy, and abortion in the United States.
    Krasevac EL
    Linacre Q; 1996 Aug; 63(3):14-22. PubMed ID: 11654476
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Abortion and the neutral state.
    Hunt RP
    First Things; 1990 Oct; 6():42-5. PubMed ID: 11659507
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Abortion and the Pied Piper of compromise.
    Clark AE
    N Y Univ Law Rev; 1993 May; 68(2):265-329. PubMed ID: 11656365
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The Human Life Federalism Amendment: an assessment.
    Caron WR
    Cathol Lawyer; 1982; 27(2):87-111. PubMed ID: 11655614
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.