264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11654356)
1. Appeals panel reverses fraud finding.
Fackelmann K
Sci News; 1996 Jul; 150(1):4. PubMed ID: 11654356
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Noted finding of science fraud is overturned by a federal panel.
N Y Times Web; 1996 Jun; ():1, 20. PubMed ID: 11647108
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Science and law clash over fraud-case appeals.
Hilts PJ
N Y Times Web; 1993 Nov; ():B10. PubMed ID: 11647010
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The fraud case that evaporated.
N Y Times Web; 1996 Jun; ():A20. PubMed ID: 11647106
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Scientific reasoning and due process.
Guenin LM; Davis BD
Sci Eng Ethics; 1996 Jan; 2(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 11657786
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Star chambers will result in injustice.
Kevles DJ
Nature; 1998 Sep; 395(6700):317. PubMed ID: 11645104
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The federal research misconduct regulations as viewed from the research universities.
Wright DE
Centen Rev; 1994; 38(2):249-72. PubMed ID: 11656759
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Misconduct charges dropped against AIDS virus scientist.
Hilts PJ
N Y Times Web; 1993 Nov; ():1, 11. PubMed ID: 11647009
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Scientific misconduct: present problems and future trends.
Mishkin B
Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Apr; 5(2):283-92. PubMed ID: 11657867
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The history and future of the Office of Research Integrity: Scientific Misconduct and Beyond.
Pascal CB
Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Apr; 5(2):183-98. PubMed ID: 11657856
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. 3-year inquiry exonerates breast cancer researcher.
Weiss R
Washington Post; 1997 Mar; ():A13. PubMed ID: 11647160
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The assault on David Baltimore.
Kevles DJ
New Yorker; 1996 May; 72(13):94-98, 100-104, 106-109. PubMed ID: 11654450
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Findings of scientific misconduct; notice.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Office of the Secretary
Fed Regist; 1993 Jun; 58(117):33830-2. PubMed ID: 11645231
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The Office of Scientific Integrity.
Hamilton DP
Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 1992 Jun; 2(2):171-5. PubMed ID: 11645744
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Innovation and integrity in biomedical research.
Jasanoff S
Acad Med; 1993 Sep; 69(9 Suppl):S91-5. PubMed ID: 11652808
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Scientific misconduct: undue process.
Efron R
Account Res; 1993; 3(2-3):223-38. PubMed ID: 11652297
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. "I am innocent," embattled biologist says.
Hilts PJ
N Y Times Web; 1991 Jun; ():C1, C10. PubMed ID: 11646863
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The role of federal regulations in assuring research integrity.
Friedman PJ
Account Res; 1993; 3(2-3):111-6. PubMed ID: 11652290
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Policing fraud and deceit: the legal aspects of misconduct in scientific inquiry.
Protti M
J Infor Ethics; 1996; 5(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 11653390
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Scientific misconduct: a form of white coat crime.
Kline S
J Pharm Law; 1993; 2(1):15-34. PubMed ID: 11653114
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
