202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11654372)
21. The care and treatment of the terminally ill: questions raised by McConnell v. Beverly Enterprises-Connecticut, Inc.
Peters EA
Conn Law Rev; 1989; 21(3):543-50. PubMed ID: 11650429
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Cruzan and the constitutional status of nontreatment decisions for incompetent patients.
Robertson JA
Georgia Law Rev; 1991; 25(5):1139-202. PubMed ID: 11652580
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. The evanescence of living wills.
Francis LP
Real Property Probate Trust J; 1989; 24(1):141-64. PubMed ID: 11652557
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Atlanta court bars efforts to end life support for stricken girl, 13.
Smothers R
N Y Times Web; 1991 Oct; ():A10. PubMed ID: 11647898
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Chicago opinion of marginal value.
Parnisari EP
Health Prog; 1988 Mar; 69(2):8, 10. PubMed ID: 11645605
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. From Quinlan to Cruzan: patterns in the fabric of US "right-to-die" case law.
Allsopp ME
Humane Med; 1992 Apr; 8(2):122-31. PubMed ID: 11651322
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Decisionmaking in authorizing and withholding life sustaining medical treatment: from Quinlan to Cruzan.
Keilitz I; Bilzor JC; Hafemeister TL; Brown V; Dudyshyn D
Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1989; 13(5):482-93. PubMed ID: 11654759
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Child abuse by whom? -- Parental rights and judicial competency determinations: the Baby K and Baby Terry cases.
Bopp J; Coleson RE
Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1994; 20(4):821-46. PubMed ID: 11652997
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. What role for surrogate decision makers?
Hubbard H
Origins; 1993 Feb; 22(34):576-9. PubMed ID: 11652129
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Ends and means of life: the Supreme Court and withdrawal of nutrition and hydration.
Feenan D
J Ir Med Assoc; 1995; 88(5):152, 151. PubMed ID: 11657627
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Bitter fight to Supreme Court over the life of a man who can only smile.
Lewin T
N Y Times Web; 1996 Feb; ():A8. PubMed ID: 11647133
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Suicidal competence and the patient's right to refuse lifesaving treatment.
Matthews MA
Calif Law Rev; 1987 Mar; 75(2):707-58. PubMed ID: 11652518
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Appointing a proxy under the best of circumstances.
White PD
Utah Law Rev; 1992; 1992(3):849-60. PubMed ID: 11656534
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Medical behavior that shortens life: current developments in the Netherlands.
Griffiths J
Clin Ethics Rep; 1994; 8(2-3):1-24. PubMed ID: 11659938
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. The Hastings Center guidelines on forgoing treatment.
Mead AP
Clin Ethics Rep; 1988; 2(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 11651918
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. The Nancy Cruzan case.
McCormick RA
Midwest Med Ethics; 1989; 5(1-2):2-31. PubMed ID: 12091960
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Louisiana's Natural Death Act and dilemmas in medical ethics.
Vitiello M
LA Law Rev; 1985; 46(2):259-309. PubMed ID: 11649843
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. The limits of proxy decisionmaking for incompetents.
Buchanan AE
UCLA Law Rev; 1981; 29(2):386-408. PubMed ID: 11660397
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Advance medical directives: policy perspectives and practical experiences.
Weinberg JK; Brod M
J Ethics Law Aging; 1995; 1(1):15-35. PubMed ID: 11654484
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Death in the legislature: inventing legal tools for autonomy.
Sabatino CP
Rev Law Soc Change; 1991-1992; 19(2):309-39. PubMed ID: 11652237
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
