177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11654375)
1. Death by right: a call for change to Michigan's health care decisions law.
Jolley JD
Univ Detroit Mercy Law Rev; 1995; 72(4):927-58. PubMed ID: 11654375
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health: a clear and convincing call for comprehensive legislation to protect incompetent patients' rights.
Suhr JN
Am Univ Law Rev; 1991; 40(4):1477-519. PubMed ID: 11651350
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Protecting the right to die: the Patient Self-Determination Act of 1990.
Mulholland KC
Harvard J Legis; 1991; 28(2):609-30. PubMed ID: 11651225
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The Cruzan legacy: legislative and judicial responses and insights for the future.
Gieszl HC; Velasco PA
Ariz State Law J; 1992; 24(2):719-801. PubMed ID: 11654081
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Cruzan II: a clear and convincing travesty.
Bopp J; Avila D
Natl Univ Law Rev; 1992 Apr; 1(1):1-47. PubMed ID: 11654704
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Incompetents and the right to die: in search of consistent meaningful standards.
Strasser M
KY Law J; 1994-1995; 83(4):733-98. PubMed ID: 11654615
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The Court's role in decisionmaking involving incompetent refusals of life-sustaining care and psychiatric medications.
Parry JW
Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1990; 14(6):468-76. PubMed ID: 11659325
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. "Living will" legislation in Illinois: what it could mean to doctor and patient.
King PD
Ill Bar J; 1984 Apr; 72(8):408-410, 412-413. PubMed ID: 11649772
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Bioethics in the courts: summaries of selected judicial decisions, 1989 to 1995.
Nelson LJ
Clin Ethics Rep; 1995; 9(1-2):1-20. PubMed ID: 11653201
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Indiana's new health care consent act: a guiding light for the health care provider.
Thompson WH
Indiana Law Rev; 1988; 21(1):181-203. PubMed ID: 11659030
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Legislative trends in nonjudicial surrogate health care decision making.
Vignery B
Clgh Rev; 1989; 23(4):422-5. PubMed ID: 11653878
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The Cruzan decision -- a surgeon's perspective.
McNoble DJ
Memphis State Univ Law Rev; 1990; 20(4):569-610. PubMed ID: 11652628
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. In re Quinlan: a synthesis of law and medical technology.
Hyland WF; Baime DS
Rutgers Camden Law J; 1976; 8(1):37-64. PubMed ID: 11663167
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Judging girls: decision making in parental consent to abortion cases.
Scarnecchia S; Field JK
Mich J Gend Law; 1995; 3(41):75-123. PubMed ID: 11660504
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Withholding life support treatment in Illinois--Part I.
Hodgman DR; Frazer QR
Ill Bar J; 1984 Oct; 73(2):106-11. PubMed ID: 11658588
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws develops Uniform Health-Care Decisions Act.
Int Dig Health Legis; 1995; 46(4):563-70. PubMed ID: 11657359
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Doing justice to life: for the Cruzans, pain; for principle, a triumph; How to put life in the right to die.
N Y Times Web; 1990 Jun; ():A22. PubMed ID: 11646204
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Durable power of attorney for health care: a better choice.
Garraty CM
Conn Probate Law J; 1992; 7(1):115-41. PubMed ID: 11653116
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The status of the permanently unconscious: "You call that living?
Gold JA
Mercer Law Rev; 1991; 42(3):1087-98. PubMed ID: 11651436
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Constitutionalizing the "right to die".
Mayo TW
MD Law Rev; 1990; 49(1):103-55. PubMed ID: 11656023
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
