352 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11654439)
1. Law would remove ability of institutional review boards to waive written consent.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1996 Aug; 11(8):1-2. PubMed ID: 11654439
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Bill requires express written consent, not "passive consent.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1995 Jul; 10(7):6. PubMed ID: 11654275
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Parental consent and family planning research involving minors: case study.
Herceg-Baron R
IRB; 1981 Nov; 3(9):5-7. PubMed ID: 11649402
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Teenagers and questionnaire research.
Holder AR
IRB; 1983; 5(3):4-6. PubMed ID: 11649517
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Research involving children: an interpretation of the new regulations.
Levine RJ
IRB; 1983; 5(4):1-5. PubMed ID: 11649521
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Constraints on experimentation: protecting children to death.
Holder AR
Yale Law Policy Rev; 1988; 6(1):137-56. PubMed ID: 11650241
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. DHHS internal policies for reviewing research involving children.
Reatig N
IRB; 1981 Jan; 3(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 11661894
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Regulatory orphans: juvenile prisoners as transvulnerable research subjects.
Reed JG
IRB; 1999; 21(2):9-14. PubMed ID: 11657875
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Federal investigation concludes that institutional review boards are in trouble.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1998 Aug; 13(8):1-2. PubMed ID: 11657190
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Law No. 88-1138 of 20 Dec 1988 on the Protection of Persons Participating in Biomedical Research.
France
Int Dig Health Legis; 1989; 40(1):109-13. PubMed ID: 11659174
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Informed consent in psychiatric research.
Roth LH; Appelbaum PS; Lidz CW; Benson P; Winslade WJ
Rutgers Law Rev; 1987; 39(2-3):425-41. PubMed ID: 11659013
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Family dynamics and children in medical research.
Gordon VM; Bonkovsky FO
J Clin Ethics; 1996; 7(4):349-54; discussion 362-4. PubMed ID: 9029336
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Institutional review boards, genetic research, and privacy.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1996 Sep; 11(9):6. PubMed ID: 11660229
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Research with radiation and healthy children: greater than minimal risk.
Freeman WL
IRB; 1994; 16(5):1-5. PubMed ID: 11652791
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Protection of human subjects.
United States
Code Fed Regul Shipping; 1982 Oct; Part 46, Sections 46.101 to 46.306():. PubMed ID: 11660819
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Using the brain dead for medical research.
Martyn SR
Utah Law Rev; 1986; 1986(1):1-28. PubMed ID: 11651917
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Can teenagers participate in research without parental consent?
Holder AR; Veatch RM
IRB; 1981 Feb; 3(2):5-8. PubMed ID: 11662830
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Institutional review boards, research on children, and informed consent of parents: walking the tightrope between encouraging vital experimentation and protecting subjects' rights.
Katerberg RJ
J Coll Univ Law; 1998; 24(3):545-79. PubMed ID: 16331880
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act.
Netherlands
Bull Med Ethics; 1999 Nov; No. 152():13-8. PubMed ID: 11658081
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Protection of persons undergoing biomedical research: Code of Public Health; Book IIA.
France
Bull Med Ethics; 1991 Mar; No. 66():8-11. PubMed ID: 11651087
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
